Post number #294625, ID: 5d1aa7
|
Which will you buy?
Post number #294712, ID: 90498c
|
Non but i prefer BFV.
Post number #295067, ID: 390190
|
BO4. At least they fucked didn't put SJW scum in story about WW2.
Post number #295084, ID: 2b03e3
|
If they were gonna go whacky and unrealistic commit to it. Battlefield was about authenticity not realisim, but now they've thrown that out the window too.
Post number #295107, ID: 4a87d5
|
Neither both have lost their "souls" years ago
Post number #295142, ID: 1a043b
|
They don't know their time ran out, their are overusing the last leftovers with some pieces of every thing famous they find around. Also don't support EA, never ever.
Post number #295149, ID: dfdcba
|
Neither, because these franchises fucking suck.
Post number #295673, ID: f86388
|
>>295142 No i can not agree but BFV had its chance to make a good fucking game and they fucked it up and not because they are a bad company but they afraid the voice of the mass.They are a big company so they need money so of course they wouldn't creat something good but something appealing to the masses and those that would give them publicity problems.
Post number #295749, ID: f722f0
|
>>295673 publicity problems? I only see journalists and analycers saying a lot of good things, and there are a lot of blind people who still finds fine paying for a game 4 times, and who thinks EA do right releasing incomplete games and then update them little by little.
Post number #295750, ID: f722f0
|
EA only lives because hype, thats how Sims survived, how Star Wars survived, how Battlefield survived and so Need For Speed and Sports games. And they don't care anything about their consumers, they can delete all your games from your account foe error without giving any answer and they keep saying they are listening to fans. How can you still fall for a lyer company who only promises and if they think about their promises they do the oposite?
Post number #295939, ID: 3835dc
|
Umm can i go with neither?
Post number #296355, ID: 7c14c4
|
>>295067 BF was never realistic. This is entirely just a move to let women play video games. Chill out
Post number #296619, ID: 63968b
|
>>296355 Yeah, let's rewrite story for the sake of women
Post number #296620, ID: f544d1
|
I'm fine with a spin off like bad company. But it's the naming treats it like the main thing.
Post number #296649, ID: 1a043b
|
>>296619 yeah, cause those games with male characters are real. Its fiction, never in Battlefield of CoD was said it was based on a real story, it's just based on a'introduce any age per game' with its events, its not a recreation of those wars. Just the base of those games, the soldiers going basically solo killing everything without strategies has nothing to do with reality
Post number #296729, ID: f544d1
|
>>1a043b battlefield tried to be authentic and self serious. Its not that surprising to see people reacting poorly to the whacky nature of it.
That being said, if they had a campaign about a female sniper/tank operator and promoted it prominently with the same direction as B1 I think people would be in less of a tizzy.
Again if they had named it Battlefield:Femboy company it would be better.
Post number #296941, ID: 6716fc
|
You could just say its a trap, your soldier will still have a dick so don't worry
Total number of posts: 17,
last modified on:
Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1527362522
| Which will you buy?