Post number #270565, ID: 89b534
|
Multiplayer beta is out on steam why aren't you playing it? And if you are, with who? Do you like the way they handled it or would you rather have had some sort of competitive aspect like if you were neighbors competing for the best farm? What are your /thots/
Post number #271139, ID: b61b84
|
I don't have any friends ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Post number #271300, ID: d11c53
|
Shared money is a buzzkill
Post number #272611, ID: 291e6c
|
i wish i had friends to enjoy it lol but the extra stuff that came with the update is pretty cool.
Post number #272781, ID: 340e32
|
Tried it. Stardew is old hat imho.
Post number #273095, ID: 69e150
|
>>271139>>272611 You two are now friends go play <3
>>271300 Why? How else could they do it? Any other implementation sounds like it would create competition rather than collaboration and remove the comfy aspect of the game. And this is coming from me, a dirty fucking capitalist. I'm enjoying my virtual commune farm RP.
Post number #273096, ID: d11c53
|
>>273095 if the profits were shared but spending wasn't or something When you're all trying to save up but one person goes and buys like, a backpack or something and drains your funds is kind of annoying
Post number #273141, ID: ce3b93
|
>>273096 As in only one person can spend funds? That doesn't sound fun
The real issue is not playing with people you can trust to work with if this is a problem. My groups have a lot of fun working together to prioritize tasks and it requires all of us being able to spend what we need at any time. Most purchases we sign off on verbally anyhow.
Post number #274050, ID: 614c7f
|
>>273141 I think their idea was each has their own wallet and profit was split but they pay for themselves
Post number #274199, ID: ec31bb
|
It's called Co-Op in the main menu for a reason
Post number #274434, ID: a499ed
|
Hey if a business hires somebody do they have access to the entire company funds?
Post number #274435, ID: a499ed
|
The CEOs all don't share money even though they have the same goal
Post number #274612, ID: 88d44a
|
>>274050 I mean that has issues too Because then everyone in a four player game takes four times as long to buy anything, which allows everything else down a ton
Post number #274650, ID: 291e6c
|
Its... Its still in beta guys, who knows maybe when the full update is out you wont share your funds
Post number #274865, ID: 6f4c52
|
But I want my funds to be shared >:(
Post number #274867, ID: 6f4c52
|
He could add an option
Post number #274914, ID: 2c7090
|
suggestion: everyone has individual funds earned with a "group fund" that gains a bit whenever you ship stuff and ALSO you can donate to if you want
Post number #274935, ID: 25fd4b
|
Post number #274961, ID: aac543
|
I like shared funds just because it makes sense. You're both earning that money and in reality you share the money and both make decisions on how it's spent. Gives you a real sense of, hey you're a team. Plus with two or even four people, you can be incredibly more efficient so it makes sense balance-wise.
But yeah, an option to make so it isn't could be neat for a more casual time or even competitive plays.
Post number #274971, ID: b2534b
|
What kind of friends do you gurls play with that you can't just ask them to halt their spending/ coordinate the spending
Post number #275041, ID: d943dd
|
That's why its called CO-OP
Post number #275083, ID: daa2dd
|
>>271300 If you and you friend are married in-game, it'll be a realistic portrayal of marriage! :-P
Total number of posts: 22,
last modified on:
Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1525857542
| Multiplayer beta is out on steam why aren't you playing it? And if you are, with who? Do you like the way they handled it or would you rather have had some sort of competitive aspect like if you were neighbors competing for the best farm? What are your /thots/