danger/u/
This thread is permanently archived
How do i start a conversation with someone over the internets

| Theyre depressed and very much like me


| You type words and send them.


| >>653280 yes but what words should i type in order to get as positive a reaction from them as possible


| do you know them or not?


| >>653283
Is this your first contact with the human race or you've just ran away from the mental hospital?


| idk know op I'm still trying to figure that out. You talk to someone a bit and everything thing seems good then by the next day they never send you a message again


| >>653298 quit being a jerk. I didnt take your comment literally, I just replied passive-agressively since i wished for a serious answer.


| >>653302
So sit down now, take a pen and a notebook, and write down your first lesson: your don't talk passive-aggressively to strangers.


| You don't.


| >>653306
I mean their response wasn't particularly aggressive? Don't think it really justified a retaliative response...

Anyways, op is probably asking this question because of examples like this where they don't say anything particularly wrong but resieve a negative response.

That or I'm full of shit.

Idk op, talking to people can be tough for some, you never know how your words can affect another person...

Just pop a hey and see where the conversation goes. Good luck.


| Receive *


| >>653327
This is the best advice you'll get. If people respond like they do in this thread they're not worth the time and energy anyway so it's best to move on.


| You can be "you"... Or you can make persona... or combinate both and confuse the person "^^


| Just start talking about the jewish influence on our nations and the degeneracy and harm they impose on us and theyll start talking pretty fast


| >>653683
Based.


| >>653280
too easy


| >>653683
Lol true. It's too easy to turn those kind of people into into a soap box.


| >>653302
Pro-tip: being passive-aggressive won't get you serious answers, only anger and unhelpfulness, you dumb bimbo ~;p


| Why did OP admit resorting to passive-aggressive behavior when they haven't ?


| >>653765
Because someone responded with unwarranted passive-aggressive replies to his opening post so he probably felt bad about responding to them. In reality he was just explaining common sense to a surly shitposter who doesn't know any better.


| >>653783
Oh ok I'm not the only one finding that odd, that's kinda reassuring.
phew

Total number of posts: 21, last modified on: Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1589135693

This thread is permanently archived