This thread is permanently archived
Net neutrality worries thread
| The only argument that Pro-Net Neutrality has is that it will somehow improve business, and that investments hadn't grown since it was implemented.
The problem is: 1) There is no "competition" to grow, because all ISP's have a monopoly and no compete clauses with each other, and 2) This is a blatant lie. Net Neutrality did not do anything to slow or negatively affect business.
| Fuck why do i keep doing this.
I meant to say that "ANTI-Net Neutrality" Only has two arguments, both of which are flimsy or an outright fabrication.
| The death of Net Neutrality can only be a bad thing for anyone who isn't an ISP.
| counter argument, corporations want more for less. And the fact that they want the lack of net neutrality will also mean that they will want to take the lines that they constructed, which seems fair, but will cripple network infrastructure because of previous practices where lines are shared. If we really want safe and healthy privatized internet, then we would have gradual transition to allow for proper stability across service providers.
| Another reason to hate cable companies even more??? As if there aren't enough already
This thread is permanently archived
| Has anyone mentioned yet how our schools and education will be affected without net neutrality?
Think about college students who struggle to even keep their apartments and get food on the table who suddenly can’t afford to access sites they need for their classes.
I’m no professional on this stuff. I don’t know exactly how it would work for education, but either way the removal of net neutrality is going to negatively affect everyone (except your service providers).