This thread is permanently archived
Isn't this place becoming more aggressive?
| probably people from other toxic imgboards.
| this is a place for dangerous opinions what do you think
| It literally says "danger". What did you expect :/
| Something must have happened recently that riled the edgy alt-right fuck-your-feelings-I'm-deep types
Relevant Captcha: tyke raids yuck
| People have been complaining about this for at least the year i've been here
Shut up and hug me <3
| yes, since the purge
| How sheltered are you double niggers? You go on site specifically for "dangerous opinions" and expect civility and coddling of feelings?
| >>419063 I don't think we were entirely sheltered, but people were definitely less pissy long ago.
>>419023 there's anger from, and towards, both political sides imo.
>slurs binge gout
| Жить стало лучше, жить стало веселей
| grrrrr i'm like totally angry and stuff goshdarnit
| OP. you should stop visiting /tech/
| Ever since the cp spam, there's been an uptick in the bitchery.
captcha relevant: leafy edgy gains
| Doesn't seem anymore aggressive than it was a year ago, after the app left the store the first time.
Just ignore them. Users will be modded as is necessary.
| >Users will be modded
can you at least make me beautiful?
| Those who replied fuck off and with valid reasons is okay. Those who just post random stupid phrase are just plain retarded.
People can be aggressive but cursing and swearing in the threads without a cause are like bored 13 year old.
| OP here.
>>418993 wow. Destroyed with FACTS and LOGIC!
>>419169 then this means I became nicer because of this place. And it's all thanks to your hard work <3.
| comf
| it's all because of me and my rude alt accounts sorry
| >>419063
This site doesn't really have any "dangerous opinions" though. Or, it may have for a minute or two until whoever posted it is banned and the thread gets closed. Have you seen how many threads that have been shut down the past weeks? Ain't no dangerous opinions here. Only edgy teens and slightly less edgy 20 year olds.
| *edgy
| fuck off
| fuck off
fuck my life
| Danger/u/ was always toxic, but there's always some comfy threads here.
Love ya OP
| The place has changed significantly. I'm unsure if violence is the right term; but we have lost some of the acceptance that used to make this place great. I personally preferred it when here was less active, but was more accepting of other opinions, even if yourself didn't believe in them. Threads have become more serious, and not in a good way. I really hope this doesn't turn into your normal "edgy" forum and the users stay truthful to their anonymous selves.
| TL;DR
Thus place has become less accepting of different opinions, and I don't like that
| Fuck me
| >>419714
Fascists don't get an opinion. Fascists aren't punk.
They can cry back to their /r/thedonald with their "free speech" doublethink.
| >>419714
Same. Of all the things this site went through, this is what's made me visit the site less. Went from multiple times a day to >>maybe once a week. The mods want the community to be a certain way and they moderate out those who don't fit in that idea of theirs and your left with people circlejerking and people who agree with the mods. They've even said as such and that's okay. It's their site; they can run it as they see fit and some g/u/rls are fine with that.
| Hm >>>maybe once a week. Forgot how to red a single word.
At least the burgs have been balanced. Guess that's a good note to end on
| It's about time in this sites lifespan we start separating the newfags from the oldfags. What is the oldfags cutoff?
| >>420021
Anyone who came here because they're fans of VA-11 Hall-a, not because they think the board is another reddit or 4chan.
The ones claiming to be oldfags and then citing one or the other are the cringiest tbh.
| >>420630
A friend of mine, who is actually the one who introduced me to this site, got banned simply because a mod disagreed with him. He was simply expressing his opinions on the matter, and a mod was just like "I disagree, and I'm a mod, so fuck you.". He's still banned.
| >>420707 yea some context would be nice
i'm not trying to justify the mod and honestly they're in the wrong no matter what, but it helps to know
| >>420720
>>420701 it's literally the first fucking rule. Mods are gods. Accept it or get the fuck out of here.
| >>420711 >>420720
If I'm going to explain, I want to say that I don't fully support either side.
Basically, it was about whether all pedophiles are bad people or not. My friend said that a lot of them aren't, while the other people said that all of them are.
Then the mod said something along the lines of "You're probably a pedophile and we don't want pedophiles here." and banned him.
As I said earlier, I want to make it clear that I don't support either side, so don't ban me please.
| >>420730 mods may be gods but you're an excellent example of the increased aggressiveness of this board. chill out, g/u/rl!
| >>420732
You're not going to get banned.
That said, there were a couple people making those threads- they originally made the threads during the CP-cleanup because they didn't like people using the word "pedophile" in a derogatory manner, and were trying to get people to stop using the word as an insult.
The problems were at least one of the IP's from one of the "defenders" came from a user that had posted CP. A few months before this, some g/u/rls had also been previously banned from /d/ for trading CP sites/a wiki, and could have been ban evading. So, to deal with it, a scorched earth policy was adopted for a time, and anyone who so much as defended the practice/outed themselves as pedophiles/etc was banned. In another case, a user attempted to appeal their ban on the discord, but then admitted that they were a pedophile as well, and was declined.
I understand that this is largely heavy handed and may have resulted in some erroneous bans and I'm sorry for that, but we cannot and will not allow danger/u/ to be a "safe place" to discuss pedophilia. The ramifications of being reported to one or more government authorities is too great.
>>420730
Thanks for the support, but in this case the g/u/rl is being polite and deserves a response in kind.
| >>420744
Thank you, and that is understandable. I still think it's kind of bullshit, but again, I get it.
| nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger nigger
| ADMIN PLS WORD FILTER
| >>421309
No, you see, saying that is completely fine here. It's the word Pedophile you should be careful about using.
This thread is permanently archived
| Like, in almost every thread there is at least one "Fuck off". What do you think?
inb4 fuck off