Post number #411746, ID: e1bc74
|
Been debating this with a friend for a while. What is your opinion g/u/rls
Post number #411747, ID: bf9b6f
|
Absolutely not. The converse is also false, trans people are not traps.
Post number #411772, ID: a6fd65
|
no. -A trap
Post number #411854, ID: fbf364
|
Traps are still genetically normal boys, so no
Post number #411855, ID: 8c0d3f
|
ТРАПЫ ЗДОХЛИ CRABRAVE
Post number #411872, ID: 66ec11
|
Some probably are trans, some aren't.
Post number #411878, ID: d07819
|
nope, traps are just crossdressers (isn't using "trap" a little derogatory to describe a trans person?)
Post number #411895, ID: 6bbc88
|
>>411854 trans women are also genetically boys.
Traps are just cross dressers just like a trans.
Post number #411940, ID: 62cfbd
|
>>411895 ok buddy dull yourself cause your gonna hurt yourself with that edge. A lot of trans don't considered themselves traps and a lot of traps don't considered themselves trans tho traps are crossdresser trans aren't, cause some just like to dress femenine while the other just feel like a girl.
Post number #411943, ID: 41e52f
|
>>411878 Yes. Its like calling a Japanese person Chinese delibrately because its wrong.
Post number #411944, ID: 62cfbd
|
>>411746 I don't know if it helps but I could be considered trans, I'm even trying to get on hrt but I feel more like a trap, since I don't care what gender people use for me I just wanna look like a girl therefore I don't care if they call me a trans or a trap. Maybe I don't have a problem with it since I don't have the word trap predifined as a way to catch a prey (since English is my second language) so it's easier for me to look at the word trap and think of a femboy.
Post number #411949, ID: 62cfbd
|
Now that I think about it I could be considered a non binary, tho I refuse to be one since my native language didn't have neutral pronouns until recently and I hate them, like lxs and Les? Really? The one I like it the most was that the elle or the io since they were actually in the Spanish language for a while
Post number #411985, ID: 380195
|
Trans women are women Crossdressera and femboys are boys "Trap" is a slur Goodnight
Post number #412004, ID: 6bbc88
|
>>411940 there was nothing edgy about that statement.
I don't care what a mentally ill person thinks, you can't argue with the reality.
Post number #412022, ID: 9d2751
|
>>411985 >trap is a slur Only because you unrelated people want it to be so you can get offended for us and kind pretend you're a good person when you're not. Kindly fuck off. -A trap
Post number #412027, ID: 6eaaaf
|
this thread went to shit quick huh
Post number #412030, ID: 420139
|
To prove Hypothesis - Traps is trans So trans is also traps Traps if and only if Trans >if trans then traps We know that trans are women but Traps are cross-dressing which is an of wearing the opposite sex, nothing to do with gender If you are trans you are not a trap If trans then traps is false Contradict with hypothesis
Why Am I doing this...
Post number #412054, ID: 62cfbd
|
>>412004 the reality is that nor biology nor chemistry can proves that trans girls aren't girls cause the body can change a lot with just some pill and/or surgery, if you wanna prove me wrong then go to a park and tell me how many people there are trans, I guarantee you that you'll just click the ones that havent been on hrt for at least 2 months, you won't be able to find any post op trans and you'll have a few completely wrong. Stop hating people or you'll die alone.
Post number #412057, ID: 62cfbd
|
>>412022 the problem trans people has with the word trap is that people use it for them, traps don't care about the word but when it's directed towards trans people they take it literally, thinking that they are referring about the act of trapping cis person. Add to that the fact that trap is a internet word so people who only use it for social media won't know that they aren't being referred as a literal trap.
Post number #412079, ID: 9db57a
|
>>411772 send pics or you're lying
Post number #412137, ID: 9248db
|
>>412054 having a hole where your dick and balls used to be, dont make someone a girl.
Post number #412138, ID: 62cfbd
|
>>412137 I agree, pre op trans are girls too
Dealer's choice honey. You don't *need* to have a set pronoun you can just roll with whatever you get ;//>
Post number #412781, ID: da6594
|
Traps: Boys who like to cross-dress and look all cute. Think Link in a Gerudo outfit - not trans at all, just cute. Also gay to fug. They like their bodies and just wanna be very cute boys.
Trans people - People who have a mental condition called gender dysphoria and hate their bodies and want to be in a different one so they go through surgical/hormonal manipulation to achieve this goal.
Trains: Go Choo-Choo, arguably the cutest of them all.
Post number #412809, ID: 6bbc88
|
>>412655 no they are not.
Post number #412826, ID: 2ded9e
|
Traps are cute boys. >>412280 Yes.
Post number #412912, ID: 380195
|
Gender is a social construct Chromosomes do not dictate who should be allowed to wear a skirt
Post number #412920, ID: 88d0dc
|
>>412912 no it is not. If you're a guy and wear a skirt then you're just crazy and need medical attention.
Post number #412926, ID: 5f0236
|
What am I doing here...
Post number #412949, ID: 88d0dc
|
>>412926 feeding the troll
Post number #412951, ID: bf9b6f
|
>>412920 Even if you're part of the crowd that thinks "social construct" means "doesn't exist lmao", you have to accept that "only girls can wear skirts" is something that society sort of agreed upon, but it could've been the other way around. A guy wearing a skirt is only wrong because it's devious from the standard of society, which is why you think they're crazy, because they're not acting as expected of them. And it's a lot of hyperbole at that.
captcha:horsy throb hula
Post number #412952, ID: 6bbc88
|
>>412951 men wearing a skirt sick because no one in their right mind would do that.
Post number #412955, ID: bf9b6f
|
>>412952 Unless you're saying that no one,not even girls,should wear skirts because they're bad,please,explain why without using the concept of a social construct.
Post number #412968, ID: 6bbc88
|
>>412955 what I'm saying is that if you have a twat you can wear a skirt, if you have a dick then you can't.
It doesn't matter if your dick was cut and now you have a hole.
Post number #412978, ID: 13d7c8
|
why is anybody even bothering with this insane mountain of bullshit. it's a dude with a dress on. if you think he's cute that's on you. don't go making scientific theories and philosophy on a dude with a dress on. what the fuck.
seriously you got better things to do. what the fuck are you using your brain for. fuck.
Post number #412987, ID: 5f0236
|
>>412968 Hum, I can wear whatever the fuck I want. I don't need any extra clearance because I got a dick.
Post number #412991, ID: 6bbc88
|
>>412987 i can, I'm not saying you can't.
But you can't bitch about people stating the fact.
Post number #412993, ID: 6bbc88
|
>>412978 i got nothing to do.
Post number #412994, ID: 6bbc88
|
>>412991 you can*
Post number #413002, ID: 5f0236
|
>>412991 Ok then let's be friends.
Post number #413003, ID: 513f88
|
>>412993 go cook, go exercise, go read a book, go watch science videos, urban exploration clips, go read paranormal stories,
Post number #413005, ID: 5f0236
|
>>413003 (Nice one)
Post number #413006, ID: 6bbc88
|
>>413003 why should I do such tremendous things?
Post number #413009, ID: aed78a
|
>>413006 because you're bored otherwise and discuss trivial shite.
Post number #413011, ID: 6bbc88
|
>>413009 but I like talking about shit
Post number #413039, ID: 62cfbd
|
>>412968 so were going to just forget a garment used by mens since the prehistory just cause some jabroni decide that it was a womans garment now? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skirt#History its not like there male skirts right? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skirt#Male_wear https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Men%27s_skirts#Revival
also neopaganism seems pretty cool, would love to party for Dionysus while waring a skirt https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Men%27s_skirts#Wicca_and_neo-paganism
Post number #413049, ID: 6bbc88
|
>>413039 I'm not talking about skirts, someone bring it up that why I was talking about it.
What I'm saying is: If you're a guy and wear female clothes then you are mentally ill.
If you're a guy or a girl and think that your dick or twat doesn't tell what your gender is, then you are mentally ill.
Post number #413065, ID: 22f786
|
>>6bbc88 you take up like half the posts in this thread go get a hobby
Post number #413071, ID: 6bbc88
|
>>413065 and you are on every fucking thread mentioning id instead of post number, go become a hero.
Post number #413072, ID: 6bbc88
|
>>413060 why, What?
Post number #413086, ID: bf9b6f
|
>>413071 Stop. It makes sense to mention the ID instead of the post number in this case. btw, an*
Post number #413089, ID: 429433
|
>>413072 why is what you say true?
Post number #413095, ID: 22f786
|
>>413071 who the fuck are you even talking about? i haven't posted on this site in days
Post number #413099, ID: 62cfbd
|
>>6bbc88>>6bbc88>>6bbc88>>6bbc88>>6bbc88>>6bbc88>>6bbc88 Oh your that dude, didn't we told you that if someone mentioned you by the I'd then shes referring to all the bullshit you said instead of, you know fish all your post and have like 4 lines full of post numbers. Also if someone use the post number then shes referring to something in that post Also² about everyone use this method, your like the only one who didn't got it yet
Post number #413120, ID: 5f0236
|
>>413049 Men and women, on this planet, are not defined by what they wear. They can influence your judgement towards them by wearing specific clothes. But they're not defined by that. Ever. The fact that I can be deceived by people who dress in a particular way just shows how ENGRAVED into our minds the idea that clothes define people is. Crossdressers exploit this. And crossdressing has been used before when women weren't allowed to play in pieces.
Post number #413121, ID: 5f0236
|
Crossdressing has no fucking thing to do with wanting to be of the oposite sex.
Post number #413122, ID: 5f0236
|
Or being gay, for that matter.
Post number #413281, ID: a61fe4
|
>>413049 All this talk about mental illness but no insane person would obsess this much over what strangers like to wear
Post number #413282, ID: a61fe4
|
no sane person*
Post number #413283, ID: 6bbc88
|
>>413281 no sane person would just accept that mental illnesses are considered good things now days.
| Been debating this with a friend for a while. What is your opinion g/u/rls