danger/u/
This thread is permanently archived
Why is it the people that always care about free speech on websites end up supporting white supremacists?

| I mean come on, yes there's the intellectual people that understand we can't take away free speech, but every time I take a trip to a place like voat or subreddits that are priding themselves on not having "censorship" it ends up being the same people that hate feminists, Muslims, and any other culture outside of their own. And they sure as hell don't seem to express these views with any tact or justification.

Not criticisms, no, outright bigotry.


| Because they want free speech to criticize said people. Not hard to understand.


| Unfortunately, those who are politically to the distant right have a tendency to take common words and repurpose them. In some circles, "free speech" has become code for "say whatever hateful bullshit I want". Some others I've noticed include: "thug" as a code for the N-word, "heritage" as code for racist/sexist views, etc.

Free speech doesn't mean you can say whatever you wish with no consequences.


| It is rather funny how places that allow freedom of speech all lean right, while places with don't always end up left wing. It's almost as if you have to forcefully censor right wing ideas or they win out in the end...


| >>405277 >>405277


| >>405286
Far right are racist bigots and far left are sensitive special snowflakes.


| >>405295 >>405286
^


| >>405286
>censor right wing ideas or they win out in the end
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Or maybe its the fact people just don't want to see your supid fucking ass.
I'm all for giving you retards a spotlight. It shows you're fucking stupid.
Hows them gay frogs doing?
Its even funnier because you retards defend the corps that actually do that shit. The chemicals turning frogs gay are monsanto chemicals. But you blame dems because you're literal tools.


| They don't have anywhere else to go


| They don't, the right just likes to claim that criticism is a violation of their rights. *they* get to say whatever they want, but if someone says they're wrong it's censorship.


| >>405271
It's because free speech is a cover for their ostentacious beliefs. In truth, they wouldn't care one lick if free speech were abolished as long as they were the ones who came out on top.


| >>405334 frogs are a myth


| Probably because supremacists flock to them for protection, as they have to either accept them on principle or be rekt for being hypocrites.


| I doubt your personal observations are based on any statistical evidence. For example I support free speech. I'm not a white supremacist and also know a good amount of people that share my position.


| Because it's one of their backdoors of choice from democracy to fascism.


| Because you can't even say Hugh Mungus w/o being accused of rape. Because if you can't criticize feminism w/o being called nazi. Because people can say "I wish all white males were dead" but you can't say those words about anybody else. If it isn't censorship and double standarts then what is it? All these liberal shit is no better than right shit


| Because you're taking this claim from inside your ass and you were just looking to start a circlejerk thread to criticize anyone thay disagrees with you, call them the worst things you can think of and blame it on a natural right that you only want you and your people to exercise.


| >>>/new/


| What an prancing faggot thread

Total number of posts: 19, last modified on: Fri Jan 1 00:00:00 1536936179

This thread is permanently archived