This thread is permanently archived
50 years after a zombie apocalypse starts
| tbh, I don't think a zombie epidemic would affect society too much. Depends on how resilient the zombies are and how people become zombies, really. If there's just 1 point of origin of it, no matter what kind of zombies they are, absolutely nothing happens and it's stopped in like a week give or take.
If there's actually an apocalypse, I'd say people would've settled in 50 years, there would be some specialization and the older survivors would be focused on sharing their knowledge.
| >>381229 pretty much this
not trying to be edgy or anything, but humans are the cockroaches of evolution. humanity is pretty persistent. so civilization will always find a way, and life will carry on. maybe in a couple hundred years from the apocalypse things will be close to normal
| >>381269
>>not trying to be edgy or anything, but humans are the cockroaches of evolution.
No, that would be the cockroaches.
| It's a Romero Zombie Epidemic or a Non Romero Zombie Epidemic?
If it's a Romero one, the closer to Texas, the better.
If we are dealing with 245 Trioxin Zombies, it's a 50/50.
If we are dealing with mind control zombies and asiatic lolita zombies, there will be nothing left.
| Depends on the zombie mythology.
If all people who die become zombies, maybe the infrastructure could adapt to create a convention of destroying the heads of those who die, but outbreaks would be inevitable.
I reccon we could bounce back fairy quickly if the only way to become a zombie would be to be bitten.
This thread is permanently archived
| Assuming that humanity actually survives, what do you think life would be like? Keep in mind that by then any ppl infected in during the beginning of the apocalypse would have roted away and that the majority of survivors would have been born well into the apocalypse, with survivors born durring the beginning or before the apocalypse being or becoming too old to really do anything.