This thread is permanently archived
My complaint about danger/u/
| According to danger/u/, its claque stands for learning and opening the mind. In practice, it stands for trafficking in our blood, our birthright, and our security. I myself certainly contend that danger/u/ is a crude nonentity. How else can I characterize an organization that did all of the following and then some?
| >Pilfer the national treasure
>Foster quislingism at every opportunity
>Distract attention from more important issues
| I could lengthen this list, but I shall rest my case. The point is that danger/u/ is causing all sorts of problems for us. We must grasp these problems with both hands and deal with them in a forthright way.
| To put this in context, when danger/u/ says that it's simply misunderstood and is actually interested only in peace, that's just a load of spucatum tauri. Danger/u/ wants us to feel sorry for the arrogant busybodies who perform the most inhumane acts of violence the world has ever seen.
| I, speaking as someone who is not a fatuous skinflint, allege we should instead feel sorry for their victims, all of whom know full well that we don't merely have a danger/u/ problem. We have a danger/u/ crisis.
| That said, danger/u/ refers to a variety of things using the word “historicocabbalistical”. Translating this bit of jargon into English isn't easy. Basically, it's saying that it is a champion of liberty and individual expression, which we all know is patently absurd. At any rate, it teaches workshops on plagiarism. Students who have been through the program compare it to a Communist re-education camp.
| Trying to keep danger/u/ from pitting race against race, religion against religion, and country against country is a sucker's game. No matter how hard we try to stop it, it'll always find some new way to drag everything that is truly great into the gutter.
| I predict that in a lustrum or two, people will generally agree that danger/u/ would sooner get a lobotomy than give the needy a helping hand as opposed to an elbow in the face. This is a prediction that will not be true in all cases, but it is expected to become more common as time passes. The irony is that danger/u/'s most hate-filled calumnies are also its most unctuous. As the French say, "Les extremes se touchent."
| Danger/u/'s criticisms of my letters have never successfully disproved a single fact I ever presented. Instead, its criticisms are based solely on its emotions and gut reactions. Well, I refuse to get caught up in danger/u/'s "I think … I believe … I feel" game.
| Whenever danger/u/ is presented with the statement that it's not only hoggish but pathetically so, it spews out the hackneyed excuse that profits come before people. Ironically, such screwball logic is likely to convince even more people that it's easy to tell if danger/u/ is lying. If its lips are moving, it's lying.
| I challenge danger/u/ to point out any text in this post that proposes that mediocrity is a worthwhile goal. It isn't there. There's neither a hint nor a suggestion of such a thing. I am now in a position to define what I mean when I say that I am concerned that danger/u/'s vague and overly broad definition of “anatomicochirurgical” will cause the most unholy bureaucrats I've ever seen to play the blame game in the immediate years ahead.
| What I mean is that it's a malodorous opportunist. In fact, it's worse than a malodorous opportunist; it's also a cantankerous, stingy misanthrope. That's why it feels obligated to get on my nerves.
| quality shitpost
|
| this feels like it should be on /cyb/
| Should have stopped when you said you rested your case.
| But. Have you ever thought about....Just being excellent to people?
| >Being this autistic
| that's it. you're being sent to gulag
| Woah, that's alot of words.
| you definitely need to be sent to danger/u/ re-education camp. I have already reported you to the local officer and other politburo members. Good luck
This thread is permanently archived
| This post is going to be a book of revelations to many readers. In particular, many will be surprised to learn that danger/u/ is incapable of looking with an open mind at anything that doesn't strictly endorse its views. Let me begin by saying that I have come to see danger/u/'s claque as fraudulent