Should handles be allowed on threads outside of cyb
Post number #199378, ID: 015eae
|
I would have to say no. >#HandleMyCock#
Post number #199383, ID: 5ef568
|
no
Post number #199403, ID: d8dae4
|
Sometimes I want to browse the board without playing character, so no. Let's not have them be a thing outside /cyb/.
Post number #199409, ID: 78bbc8
|
Fun and all but rather not use a handle >randomfookinhandle
Post number #199412, ID: 2da6bf
|
I still don't understand people that hate g/u/rls that use names. The point of an anon board is to say and do what you want right? So why can't someone have a handle if they want to?
Post number #199413, ID: 2da6bf
|
My real problem is you say "allowed". An anon board with strict rules and regulations like that is horrible. "Namefags" are a-okay in my book
Post number #199436, ID: b2b02c
|
>>199412 I think the hate come from "not doing it right". Just think of it a sec... > having a name > in an anon board
I think of some thing that inefficient here - It is really easy to impersonate you - When majority of people are nameless, people with name stand out so much. It might be interpreted as attention whoring - Other anon can backtrack things that you said, so you can't really say what you want. Plus it might lead to doxx if you use related names in other site
Post number #199440, ID: b2b02c
|
You know the feeling when you see other people doing pointless stuff like blowing on game cartridge, delete system32, google "download mode ram", upload all personal info on internet. You will feel the iege to stop them before they hurt themselves, or because of the second hand cringe
Post number #199449, ID: 24e16c
|
Depends. -AWAM
Post number #199459, ID: dd99ab
|
As much as I want to say anyone can do whatever they like here, this g/u/rl has good points >>199436
Especially this: > It might be interpreted as attention whoring
Total number of posts: 10,
last modified on:
Fri Jan 1 00:00:00 1521882292
| I would have to say no.
>#HandleMyCock#