This thread is permanently archived
Why are ivy league schools better than non ivy league ones?
| They're less influenced by people of proletarian backgrounds. More capital, more opportunities. Wealthier people attend ivy league universities. You get to network with more worthwhile people. It's simple.
| They aren't better, students that attend basically get free As I hear. It's just a money thing.
| >>170806
I don't think that's the case. The quality of education compared to other schools is quite better. The faculty with better backgrounds lead to better education if students truly apply themselves, and I mean spend all of their time studying. Research is better funded and faculty have research experience. The private university I went to honestly sucked because they had one professor who was research oriented, she quit and the rest don't have that interest.
| >>170815
As a result, the curriculum is half assed and I didn't learn anything, but that isn't just the fault of the teachers, the students didn't put forth effort or even come prepared to advance in the field, they were learning basics just because the field I am in pays well. My university was mainly interested in business administration, fine arts, sports, and flight operations. The sciences are all underfunded and understaffed. So schools are only good if they are good for you.
| >>170829
Yeah, I went to Hooters and they taught me how to be the best cum guzzling meat toilet I could be. You just need to have the right mindset to match your school.
| >>170815 but let's say you go to a non ivy league school for a certain area of education. And someone else goes to an ivy league school for the same area. Are you saying, despite the subjects being exactly the same, Harvard would teach it better than university of Nevada?
This thread is permanently archived
|