This thread is permanently archived
Eradicate all disease or make a world where nobody is lonely
| eradicate all disease. i bathe in loneliness like a pro loner
| Both are traps.
If you wish to eradicate all disease, the fastest way would be to kill all living being on earth.
If you wish for nobody to be lonely, the fastest way to achieve it is to kill everyone
| Loneliness can head towards a disease called depression, so without any disease existing there will be no loneliness anymore.
| End loneliness
More love to all
LOOOOOOOOOVVVVVEEEEEEEEEE BEAAAAAAMMMMMMMMMMMMMM❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
| End all disease. If there were no loneliness, we would lose many good authors!
| End loneliness.
If we ended all diseases, people's life span would increase, thereby decreasing the significance of death or illness.
| You won't be lonely if you have yourself
| I was going to make a joke about a world without loneliness being unable to have deadly diseases but the idea of a world where you can't die if it would cause someone to be lonely which in turn leads to further isolation as to ensure you are always the reason someone isn't lonely so that you can't die seems like an interesting concept
| Kill everyone and spread hate, but not in this order
| End loneliness. Disease is easier to deal with, compared to a few decades ago we ended maybe half of it. loneliness is going the other way
This thread is permanently archived
| Which one is it going to be? Can choose only one. You're a smart gurl, you should be able to answer this.