This thread is permanently archived
Potential Loli Population
| depends on what a loli is. underdeveloped baby body? hell no, 3d kids look ugly and unattractive. being able to look 17 all your life and have small breasts? that's the kind of cunny wife i would like to have.
| As for me, I like the way I look in my 20s, but I don't really want to get any older.
| vrchat says yes
|
| I meant
| HELL NO
can you even start thinking about adapting to how much stuff you need to ask to a potential friend without being awkward?
| I would fuck one, not being one duh
| pedophiles should get tarred and feathered
| ^ this
| OP here! I forgot to add my own thoughts
Personally, I would feel happy that some people would want to be lolis, because lolis are cute
As for how many? That's difficult but I'd bet at least a 10% of the weeb population would want a loli form?
>>bdbd61 uh last time I checked, 17 yo-looking characters are not lolis, but I get what you mean and I respect your thoughts
>>1011458 well yeah in Vrchat this is a reality already
>>093dfd hum? I didn get what u wrote there
| forget*
| VR Chat proves that there's a large amount of people already who'd choose a loli form.
| >>1011501 no, I just agree with your statement, why would I change my IP? All pedo should die a horrible death
| i personally like being tall, but a more youthful appearance is nice
which is why i use a tall foxg/u/rl vrchat avatar
| >>1011497 I just kinda enjoy small bodied girls with small forms, but kinda developed ones, not kids
and I love a mature character like milfs have
It's a shame that this combo is very rare in real life, we need to better educate and teach manners our future generations
| >>1011520 you're saying the truth
It's truly a shame that shortstacks are extremely rare in real life, we can only hope the future will make them appear more
| I love sex
| It would be fun to be able to transform into a cute girl for a couple hours and experience sex from a woman's perspective. Fuck what am I saying? Thats kinda gay desu. Anyway, 2D lolis are cute but IRL kids don't look that great. Plus if you had that kind of body nobody would take you seriously and you wouldn't be able to buy drugs or buy weapons or watch horror movies. They'd just think your a kid and tell you to GTFO.
I guess a titcow form would be interesting.
| >>1011563 very based and insightful g/u/rl
Howeevr, I think that if virtual lolis that are actually adults in real life become mainstream or common, then probably they would be considered more adult-like, arenn't they?
Shortstacks wouldn't even have that problem of course lol
| hot take
i'd take living a pixie form for a day or so
looking like an adult proper, just
smol
certainly not a permenant change, bur i'd be down to just sit on my bro's shoulder and be his intrusive thoughts for a day lol
| * Pomu
| Asumming that in the future, technology and medicine (or very advanced virtual spaces) allow people to permanently give them a Pomu appearance:
Do you think a lot of people would want to be Pomu? How many? Would you be interested in having a Pomu body?
—Pomu de una famulia noble Pomulia—
| one
-not Pomu de una famulia noble Pomulia-
| >>1011565
But then the hard part is distinguishing adult lolis from actual children. It would probably lead to a lot of kids getting hit on by accident increasing the violence in society and causing unwanted pregnancies.
| >>1011683
Basically my exact thoughts reading through this. It would make it a lot easier for people to get away with harming actual kids. Not that doesn't happen constantly already, but it could make it worse
On the other side of things though, I know some people would probably be very happy with the option of this. People who feel like they missed out on a childhood, people who regress, as well as people who just find comfort in that kind of presentation
| Wait I might be wrong actually. A society that would be perfectly fine with allowing people that option would probably also be a society that has things a lot more figured out than we do now. Pedophilia is the number one thing used for fear mongering currently. The same people who statistically commit the most SA against kids are the same people who stir up moral panic around everything that could even vaguely be twisted to resemble CSA
So, maybe it wouldn't cause much issues then
| CAN YOU IMAGINE BECOMING A KID AND THINKING "THIS IS GONNA BE GREAT" AND THEN EVERYONE IS LIKE "WTF DO U KNOW? GET IN LINE KID" AND ALL YOUR CLASSMATES WILL BE MORONS AND YOUR TEACHERS WILL BE LIKE "NO INTERRUPTIONS! WHO CARES IF YOU FAIL YOUR TEST? MAYBE YOUR BRAIN *CAN* THROW BASEBALLS, OR TALK TO DEAD PEOPLE, OR MAKE FRIENDS BLIND? ONCE WE KNOW WHAT YOUR BRAINS CAN DO WE'LL KNOW WHAT JOB TO GIVE YOU. AND IF YOUR BRAINS ARE JUUUUST RIGHT YOU'LL GET TO SIT IN THE BIG CHAIR"
| >>1011738 this feel schizo but in a good way
Is the schizo social critique, but you wrote it quite well
I'l give you a 8/10
Now get the peck out of here, big thinker
| >>1011784 hum, actually no, even though it was well written I don't wany any more schizos, we already have enough shitting every thread
| >>219ff9 >>1011784 >>1011784 >>1011784 >>1011784 >>1011784 >>1011784 >>1011784 >>1011784 >>1011784 >>1011784 >>1011784 >>1011784 >>219ff9 >>219ff9 >>219ff9 >>219ff9 >>219ff9 >>1011784
| >>1011801 here we see the echoing cry of a schizo, finally seeing something to legitimize their unending agony as useful and clinging to it dearly, despite that faint hope being immediately snuffed by it's following comment
| >>39c87d >>1011801 >>1011801 >>1011801 >>1011801 >>1011801 >>1011801 >>1011801 >>1011801 >>1011801 >>1011801 >>1011801 >>1011801 >>39c87d >>39c87d >>39c87d >>39c87d >>39c87d >>1011801 >>39c87d >>1011801 >>1011801 >>1011801 >>1011801 >>1011801 >>1011801 >>1011801 >>1011801 >>1011801 >>1011801 >>1011801 >>1011801 >>39c87d >>39c87d >>39c87d >>39c87d >>39c87d >>1011801 >>39c87d >>1011801 >>1011801 >>1011801 >>1011801 >>1011801 >>1011801 >>1011801 >>1011801 >>1011801 >>1011801 >>1011801
| Aw man I always miss the best threads
| I think there's a little bit of an ontological misunderstanding.
To me anyway, loli is not a kid it's an ideal and a specific relationship and power dynamic, as soon as you make it real it stops being an ideal.
It sounds weird but I've seen relationships which could be described as loli, but they're both adults in their late twenties and boobalicious.
Otherwise it's just a body type preference which is fin but like your gonna crunch your bones for 4 years so you can be moe?
| >>1011946
I get what you're saying, but that's not how the term is generally used. That's your personal definition, not the commonly agreed upon one
| >>1011710
In the future, the pedophilia problem could be solved. If adults can have a loli appearance than there would be more acceptance of lolicons and shotacons. Sexual desire for children's bodies would be more accepted even if real child abusers get the rope.
| >>1011962
what even is a loli? e.g. in Urusei Yatsura, Ataru's teacher is called a lolicon for having a crush on Lum. But she has huge boobs. Not your typical loli even if she's underage. So it used to mean any guy who has a doomed love/lust for underage girl (14 in Japan). But now its associated with a very specific 2D body type: flat chest, hyper petite, childlike. But then again, all the early lolicon anime all that too. So wtf is a loli?
| >>1012042
Giving real abusers the rope on a legal level is a bad idea due to how most abusers are within family etc, but as long as street justice isn't punished I think that could work out
>>1012043
Small girl. Whether it's due to being underage or due to looking underage. That's the core of it. Unless the topic is specifically lolita fashion, loli is just that
| Lolicons should be accepted if its romantic only. But people who sexually prey on kids should get the chair. In such a world, adults will desire transition to loli/shota status just like there are guys that want to become a woman and women who want to become guys. It will then be a wedge issue in the culture wars thanks to fun hating politicians.
| >>938aa9 I suppose I'm putting forward that that's what people actually desire when they say they like loli.
In the same sense that someone can like noncon fantasy but when presented with actual noncon situation would have mixed feelings to say the least.
On the whole it's dudes who are sexually timid wanting a simplified relationship where they're predisposed to be desirable.
And to loop it back, that's why I don't think it would just be about turning one into a loli.
| >>1012178
I disagree, sort of. I've known several people who have been into that kinda stuff, and while yeah they obviously wouldn't do that shit in real life, most the ones I've talked to have all, well, had that kinda attraction
What you're talking about is also part of it though. There are people who are into it for the reasons you're bringing up, or as more of just an rp thing. I still feel like the word is mostly used to describe just, yk, actual loli though
This thread is permanently archived
| Asumming that in the future, technology and medicine (or very advanced virtual spaces) allow people to permanently give them a loli appearance:
Do you think a lot of people would want to be one? How many? Would you be interested in having a loli body?