This thread is permanently archived
Vivaldi
| Vivaldi is pretty good. I'm more of a Beethoven guy myself, but Vivaldi's "seasons" is good music. Don't know about this chrome person, I'll look them up
| Real talk, though, Vivaldi is not as good as chrome, but it works well, regardless
| Both Chrome and Vivaldi are trash. Firefox just happens to be slightly less trash.
| >>100413
>mentioning firefox
Can't even mention that name without joking now.
All these are trash anyway. Firefox hogs memory and tries to beat Chrome in "who can eat the most RAM" contest. Vivaldi is Opera but with less opera.
| so what browser is actually good??
| It's decent, but if you're looking for a good alt. browser then you should check out others such as Brave (https://brave.com). It focuses on privacy and security.
| Nah, waterfox.
| Iirc Vivaldi used the open source chromium browser as a base anyway so it should be nearly identical performance to Google chrome
| Firefox with the new quantum render engine, and multi threading is quite fast I recommend giving Firefox developer edition a try it's like nightly but with less crashing
| >>101790
I'm pretty sure developer edition is just FF Beta but with more tools for developers. Just use the regular stable Firefox if you don't want crashing
| Fuxyall, I use lynx.
| I use qutebrowser
| W3m master race
| >>101803 it's the aura update channel so I think that's the same as beta but it's basically the same. As for less crashing, normal Firefox gets stuff much later than aura does and stuff gets added to aura after it stops causing issues in nightly
| I just recommend Dev because nightly crashes too much, stable is too slow, and unused Dev tools never hurt anybody
| It's just chrome with a skin really. If you like how the UI works you will like it, if you don't you won't. I use it as a main browser and love it.
This thread is permanently archived
| How good is Vivaldi compared to Chrome? Looks pretty good but hasn't fully convinced me yet