Post number #997303, ID: 4af5d9
|
It's open and royalty free in the sense that it is believed that all relevant patents have irrevocable grants, so it's OK in my book. Google being google isn't helping though.
Post number #997308, ID: e89f99
|
it's fine. though i prefer AVIF for most things. jxl is also nice, but i don't need it much.
Post number #997424, ID: 0967f0
|
its just a case of devs being lazy again. fine format, lacklustre implementation!
Post number #997465, ID: 68001e
|
Pretty good format that's better than jpg in most ways. Just really bad integration from most mainstream software. Even a lot of FOSS projects don't bother to include it, I presume because of its reputation. Kinda make a negative feedback loop where it doesn't gain any traction because it hasn't gained any traction already.
Post number #997499, ID: c6d10b
|
It's theoretically a good format but because of the above yeah it's kinda annoying
I'm hoping jxl catches on so I can save some HDD space since it can lossless convert jpg
Post number #997515, ID: 1dc417
|
Awful image format kill it
Post number #997535, ID: 3d1d96
|
I hate saving an image and it being in webp, very inconvenient for that.
Post number #997569, ID: e7405e
|
>>997535 >very inconvenient for that. ffmpeg will save you.
Post number #997664, ID: 81fd88
|
>>997499 What makes you think jxl will catch on when the world has already failed webp?
But consider instead ditching whatever image viewer you have and use one that can read webp properly.
Post number #997707, ID: 3d1d96
|
>>997569>>997664 Thanks for the help, you make webp not seem so bad :)
Post number #997710, ID: 8c4603
|
>81fd88 It probably won't catch on, considering the drama about it with chromium. It's a shame honestly. I feel like it would be reasonable to keep maintaining a patch in spite.
Post number #997747, ID: d856a7
|
MAYBE I dunno, but MAYBE webp wouldn't be so hated if more programs and apps natively could open it, edit it, and see it
Post number #997846, ID: 7a2b28
|
>>997747 even doe a lot of programs already do nowadays
Post number #998188, ID: ce69cb
|
I only save shitposts in PNG, google can suck my dick
Post number #998505, ID: c6d10b
|
>>997664 no idea if it will, but I hope it does because of it being backwards compatible with jpg and able to losslessly store jpg while still saving space, but we basically need to convince Chrome to implement it or it's dead in the water so who knows what'll happen
Post number #998507, ID: 887a57
|
>>997664 >What makes you think jxl will catch on when the world has already failed webp? the world has not "failed webp" and google are the only fags in opposition to jxl.
Post number #998511, ID: 4af5d9
|
jxl is pronounced giskel, fyi
Total number of posts: 19,
last modified on:
Sat Jan 1 00:00:00 1706781059
|