Post number #92555, ID: 3a5ef5
|
Deluge simply for being open sauce. If you're using Mac, then Transmission would be my pick (for the same reason and for having a better UI).
Post number #92598, ID: 3d2c23
|
What's the problem with using the most common ones like bittorent and utorrent?
Post number #92602, ID: 35b4da
|
>>92598 Nothing, really. I prefer both Transmission and Deluge simply because they work in most platforms I'm in and they're light on resources as well.
Post number #92614, ID: 391905
|
BiglyBT is pretty good. Check it out. Basically same as Vuze, but without ads and all that shit.
Post number #92778, ID: b9d206
|
You've gotta be careful though, idk about the other big ones but ik BitTorrent's newest updates have crypto mines in them that'll fuck over your cpu
Post number #92823, ID: 976ff2
|
>>92598 u torrent was using some crypto currency mining stuff last time i head about it, im sure bittorrent was doing the same. qbittorrent its basically bittorrent but open source if you really want bittorent. not sure why but i deleted deluge for some reason? i dont remember but maybe it had something wrong.
Post number #93112, ID: 17d701
|
Tixati
Post number #93577, ID: e78dbb
|
Transmission just wurks
Post number #93646, ID: 8410ea
|
rtorrent + rutorrent isn't a bad choice for remote access. qBittorent is great if you're running it on a local machine, but has a subpar Web UI.
Post number #94073, ID: 66cd6c
|
an anon recommended me deluge when i asked for edgy ui apps the other day. with the right gtk theme, it just works
Post number #94089, ID: e1c4da
|
Old Version of uTorrent. AdFree and easy to use.
Post number #94280, ID: cb2f43
|
I mean yeah, 2.2.1 uTorrent is safe, but why would you use an old version when there's much better and updated alternatives
Post number #94346, ID: aab280
|
I switched from uTorrent 2.2.1 to whatever the latest deluge is. No problems whatsoever.
Post number #95464, ID: f7ec79
|
>people still using uTorrent ayyyyyyyy lmao
Post number #95544, ID: a1c802
|
Deluge is open source and pretty lightweight in my experience
Post number #95643, ID: 44bdfd
|
Deluge vs. qBittorrent?
Post number #95662, ID: 8bc319
|
For Windows I use Tixati
Post number #95665, ID: b566f4
|
qBittorrent is the good choise
Post number #95707, ID: a12206
|
People always be recommending Transmission, but that bitch constantly locked up my system even after upgrades and reainstalls. I mostly use qBittorrent.
Post number #96309, ID: b4f51c
|
Ktorrent from KDE
Post number #96745, ID: 482c74
|
Deluge or Transmission. Deluge is probably the best option if you want something that Just Werkz. Transmission on the other hand has a ton of advanced features like the ability to run headless with a web interface, a script interface, a couple different ncurses-based clients, etc (fwiw i think deluge is catching up in this respect but idk how feature complete it is at the moment). Both are a bit bloated, but that's unavoidable for a gui client.
Post number #96749, ID: 482c74
|
>>93646 i used rtorrent for a while, but having to constantly have it in a detached screen was a pain in the ass. i wish it had a proper daemon mode...
Post number #97183, ID: 86a8ed
|
I would use Tixati, but I’m not stupid enough to use a closed-source torrent client. I’m using Deluge, it’s great.
Total number of posts: 24,
last modified on:
Sat Jan 1 00:00:00 1514963921
| ?