danger/u/
Let's create a HTML page again

| Everything went wrong, so let's try again.

One line per post

<!DOCTYPE html>


| <html>


| <head>


| <title>Dank Webzone</title>


| <script src="./secret-cryptominer.js"></script>


| <style>


| body {
Background: #fff;
}


| h1 {
font-family: "Papyrus",serif;
color: #400;
}


| </style>


| </head>


| </html>


| :(


| <!-- We did it! this time with head. Now I wonder if the line after the closing html will be a problem


| We still have to code the cryptominer tho.


| // secret-cryptominer.js


| <a href="http://pornhub.com">clubpenguin.com</a>


| Hypertext is great. People just forgot, that it was never designed to write software. All this javascript and php bullshit is as stupid as write programs with bureau applications like a tabular calculator or a presenting software (e.g. excel or powerpoint). Even thought it's technical possible, its as dumb as driving a screw with a hammer (or using a screwdriver to hammer a nail).
html is only for hyperTEXT. Images work too, but video already suck with html.


| >>608346 you ruined it

video is like more than half the web though so you've pinpointed why we use JavaScript

As much as I hate js it does have a use


| >>608377
The reason why you (not we) use javascript for watching videos is because you have no problem to pay for new high-end hardware each year to run an innefficient and insecure virtual machine called "browser" to get a poorly written and unfree videoplayer to work that artificially binds you to a platform provider.
I'm satisfied with having (hyper)links to videos, which I can open in a player of my choice, which is more efficient, free and functional. Javascript is unnecessary


| Don't worry gurls, i had added arrows so everything is being commented.


| >>608394
Until someone writes something like -->


| <script>


| window.onload = function() {


| while (true) {


| console.log("mining bitcoin....");


| }


| </script><script>


| console.log("yeehaw dawgs, javascript will live on even if you don't like it, who cares about performance anyways?")


| const { BrowserWindow } = require('electron'); // yeah, let's make danger/u/ client in Electron


| >>608346
this
>>608392
and deffinatly this
>>608394
someone is bound to be an ass
>>608864
It migth die to something like WASM
which even though i like performance will be a sad day for code readability.


| Uncaught SyntaxError: Unexpected identifier (>>608928:4)

Total number of posts: 31, last modified on: Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1575017260

This thread is closed.