Post number #54006, ID: 48bcc8
|
Which ones do you use? What are the benefits, downsides, and miscellaneous information?
Post number #54074, ID: 5ea62c
|
We only Arch in dangeru
Post number #54163, ID: ef27ef
|
>Arch Install Artix or kys
Post number #54165, ID: 8b2674
|
Install gentoo
Post number #54192, ID: ffdf1c
|
KDE Neon It just works
Post number #54477, ID: 686a31
|
I used mint for a while,the big problem i had with it was the downside of linux(not all programs and games are compatible with it) but like plus, since not even some of the programs made for linux work with it.But other than that its great.
Post number #54617, ID: 1c5ade
|
I use Ubuntu because I like the unity UI
Post number #55136, ID: a777be
|
>>54617 You won't like 17.10+ then...
Post number #55169, ID: 44a6c6
|
LMDE2 is lyfe.
Post number #55170, ID: 44a6c6
|
^And MATE is love, forgot to mention.
Post number #55536, ID: 22bd70
|
Install Fedora
Post number #55885, ID: 2bc199
|
The last time I tried fedora the standard repos where … unusable.
Post number #55887, ID: b0d8a4
|
I use Linux Mint with Cinnamon and Arch with i3. Both are good.
Post number #55904, ID: c37618
|
I use windows 7 its pretty good. Runs well on my macbook air.
Post number #55966, ID: d41b66
|
^you mean GNU/Windows VII
Post number #55968, ID: 9fbca8
|
^it's called ReactOS 7.0
Post number #55969, ID: 497659
|
^ok anon you win
Post number #55970, ID: 497659
|
my id changed.. whut
Post number #55997, ID: 3347d2
|
I use TinyCore, Slacko Puppy Linux, Debian and Damn Small Linux. I have really bad and slow hardware sometimes.
Post number #56389, ID: 48bcc8
|
What is your hardware? A DS lite?
Post number #56597, ID: cc3073
|
After discovering the powers of tiling WMs I run on Arch + xmonad.
Post number #57063, ID: 9c81d3
|
arch is the master race
(or nixos)
Post number #57286, ID: 14f699
|
Antergos for the noobs
Post number #57320, ID: e5b404
|
someone even uses tiling WM? I don't have thousand hours to work with tiling... though it's fun
nvm arch is ok
Post number #57381, ID: 0c0bd0
|
>nvm arch is ok
Post number #57383, ID: 0c0bd0
|
>pacman is fast but not safe, it tends to break shit and config protection is implemented in a terrible way >there is no official process to verify that a package is stable within the distro, in other distros a lot of packages are in a testing repo despite that specific package's developer claiming it to be stable on its own, because it might not be stable within the environment of a specific distro
Post number #57384, ID: 0c0bd0
|
>a lot of AUR packages pull from upstream, which means they could be very unstable >(arch vs gentoo related) arch users complain about muh compile time when it comes to gentoo, while in fact they compile a lot of AUR packages themselves, namely the *-git packages that pull the source from a git repo
Post number #57385, ID: 0c0bd0
|
>but it gets even better: they only compile a handful of packages, and those not being libraries mostly, the self-compiled packages get linked against precompiled libraries from a different setup (e.g. different optimization levels), which can then cause even more instability because it's a clusterfuck of unequal shit
Post number #57386, ID: 0c0bd0
|
>arch uses (((systemd))) and switching to something else is hard >apparently the vim package on arch pulls in X, so if you want to have a fancy terminal text editor on a headless server, you to install a shit ton of GUI stuff you'll never need nor use >maintainer told the guy who complained to just symlink vi to vim (vi is inferior)
Post number #57405, ID: 052b47
|
>57385
that made me thinking so hard
Post number #57658, ID: 7331f3
|
Fedora looks like shit but it's the most useful
Post number #57661, ID: 48bcc8
|
>>57658 In what way is it the most useful?
Total number of posts: 32,
last modified on:
Wed Jan 1 00:00:00 1512336938
| Which ones do you use? What are the benefits, downsides, and miscellaneous information?