Post number #52429, ID: dce819
|
>GNU Lesser General Public License essentially a middle ground between the GPL varieties / versions and permissive license (ex. BSD and MIT) >BSD license(s) minimal restrictions on shit, what's not to like >MIT license literally the only thing that it states is you have to distribute the license with the binary or source
Post number #52634, ID: 21dda6
|
on one hand I like the GPL keeping open source stuff open source, but the benefit that bsd has gotten from company's merging pull requests so they don't have to maintain as much in their own branch shouldn't be ignored
Post number #52635, ID: 21dda6
|
I think I usually end up with the agpl or throw some random obscure license on there just for fun :p
Post number #52870, ID: e4506a
|
>>52635 the best obscure license is the NBPL https://old.gnu.moe/nbpl/
Post number #52908, ID: 21dda6
|
>>52870 Quality license right there thanks for bringing this to my attention
Post number #52996, ID: dcecd3
|
this is the best license imo no homo https://github.com/dangeru/thanks_anon_e_license/blob/master/LICENSE
Post number #53256, ID: 140bfe
|
>>52996 Seconding this^
Post number #53282, ID: 21dda6
|
The DBAD license is pretty good https://www.dbad-license.org/
| >GNU Lesser General Public License
essentially a middle ground between the GPL varieties / versions and permissive license (ex. BSD and MIT)
>BSD license(s)
minimal restrictions on shit, what's not to like
>MIT license
literally the only thing that it states is you have to distribute the license with the binary or source