Post number #373801, ID: e292a1
|
So what's the difference? I heard people using both terms and explaining that they are misused. I am still confused, I used to think applications are mobile OS equivalents of programs, then someone told me that's not it.
Post number #373811, ID: 0d8df0
|
Here's my opinion: A program is the executable file, while an application could be a whole suite of programs.
Post number #373921, ID: 33f8a5
|
>>373811 yet what we call apps are actually just programs. People will fuck over terminology on any chance they'll get
Post number #373932, ID: 92ac25
|
>>373921 Apps is a marketing term anyways. I strongly discourage its use outside of literal Android/iOS App Store Downloads.
Post number #373973, ID: b4c598
|
>>373932 I agree but use it outside of phone contexts sometimes because it's less syllables/text
Post number #374041, ID: 8c82f3
|
>>373973 Well, it contradicts saying that you agree on discouraging improper usage of a word if you still use it for "easiness".
"app" sounds like a pop-choc-donut-kinda-word for dumbasses. Who wants to sound like that?
Post number #374110, ID: 285b3a
|
>>374041 languages evolve a e words change meaning that's natural. no one outside of few stuck up nerds use word"program" anymore. Apps is what dominates not only current windows but also Linux distributions.
Post number #374112, ID: 78ff61
|
>>374110 Who seriously calls Packages "Apps" on GNU/Linux?
Post number #374261, ID: 9e4d53
|
>>374112 doesn't the Ubuntu store thing?
Post number #374266, ID: 9e4d53
|
>>374041 good point, I was agreeing with that's where it should be used and not in other contexts, but just because I agree doesn't mean I'm not going to do it :p
To be fair most of the time I refer to a program or app by it's name and don't have much cause to say app in the first place
Post number #374267, ID: 9e4d53
|
I generally think if it comes from a "store" it's an app if it's something you download it's a program and if it comes from a package manager it's a package
Post number #374726, ID: 7eb620
|
>>374261 It's not Ubuntu store, it's Canonical's repository. And it's free.
Post number #374790, ID: 1d4c52
|
>>374261 He refers to the package manager caconical offers with ubuntu, that looks like the apple- or microsoft store. By default it only shows gui applications and no system stuff. There is also "snap" and https://www.linux-apps.com/ I personally will keep calling programs programs. Everyone understands what it is. It's more important that people understand that there are gui and cli programs and that some programs are splitted in server and client components.
Post number #374843, ID: 8978fe
|
>>374267 What if it comes on a physical CD/DVD? :^)
Post number #375429, ID: 6ab6ca
|
>>374843 then it's a shrek movie :)
Post number #375714, ID: 8ade33
|
>>374267 I get it now. When you download the program from a store, it becomes an app
Post number #375729, ID: 63f115
|
>>375714 and when you burn it to a cd it becomes a program again. Ah~ technology sure is amazing.
Total number of posts: 17,
last modified on:
Sun Jan 1 00:00:00 1532900547
| So what's the difference? I heard people using both terms and explaining that they are misused. I am still confused, I used to think applications are mobile OS equivalents of programs, then someone told me that's not it.