Post number #158759, ID: 4fd875
|
Building a new computer and just purchased a ryzen 5 1600 processor, does anyone have any thoughts on it?
Post number #158822, ID: 154b02
|
It's a good CPU.
Post number #158987, ID: 08f6e1
|
It's a bad CPU.
Post number #158997, ID: 2bca15
|
It's an ok CPU.
Post number #158998, ID: 2f68b4
|
I think it's a CPU
Post number #159056, ID: 8dbfbd
|
I've got the x version of that, pretty nice cpu, some issues with ram speed but that's Mobo I think
Post number #159149, ID: 74af58
|
The CPU is good. Saw a system built with one at a friend computer shop. Moneywise the entire computer was less then half the price for intel based similar performance. Made me think how much and for how long we have been milked by intel and anything around it.
Post number #159241, ID: 3c002e
|
It is a cpu.
Post number #159245, ID: 9e95ab
|
It's an OK CPU. Really, most 5's are good CPUs for nice price. >>159149 (singing) It's Been much too long I feel it coming on
Post number #159253, ID: 5e4a97
|
waiting for the 2nd gen ryzen 5
Post number #159990, ID: 1ae0a3
|
What about the 1500x?
Post number #160753, ID: 6c606b
|
>>159253 Do not hold your breath much. The era of new processors being significantly better than current ones is long gone. All now is about very small percentage increase in speeds while ramming up core numbers in the same die. While concurrent processing software is only really a thing in rendering applications.
Post number #160808, ID: 975f84
|
>>159990 It's not bad (to say the least, I have one but barely use it - nothing to complain, tho), however I'd save up a bit more to get 1600.
Total number of posts: 14,
last modified on:
Fri Jan 1 00:00:00 1519483509
| Building a new computer and just purchased a ryzen 5 1600 processor, does anyone have any thoughts on it?