Can one vibecode assembly?
| yes
| but you'll be lucky if it runs and it won't run well if it's anything even remotely complex
| >>1088947
i mean it as in, the pitfalls of vibecoding get exacerbated with something like assembly.
sample size in the dataset was most definitely much smaller than any other programming language, thereby you'll most likely have much worse generated code.
it's also gonna be harder to debug or tell the llm what to fix when you're likely gonna have a hard time making sense of the logic flow it spat out (since assembly is notoriously harder to read in general).
| Guess I, like tummy, found ENUF.
| And as u said "heard it all". Well. You just gotta, blind it f good. Orwhateverpff,youagainstgenetic?!??!?!mightaswellbethereasonofmillionwingsandhorsnandwhatever hahahahaha
Ah well. Bangbang. Though, I like my sleeping position more, I guess we just gonna, let the impatient, learn to, truly, close its eyes.
| Hm that sounds kina, hmm. Oh well, you need to, you know, "get stronger anyway eh"? It means, anything doesn't it.
| Using assembly only makes sense if you want to learn computing basics OR run into serious performance issues caused by a compiler or interpreter. Identifying such issues is not trivial. I doubt people smart enough to do so will benefit from "AI" generated code. Its help with learning basic knowledge is also questionable, since you need basic knowledge to evaluate the usefulness of the "AI" prompts output.
| Theoretically yes; but I fear it won't be as optimized as one doing it themselves.
There are tricks one can do if they know their own code well enough. You're gonna have a bad time.
ASM is for personal satisfaction, I don't think vibing works
Refresh
|