This thread is permanently archived
ME NEED TO GO F(P)AST
| Time is not a straight line
| Yes, but can it bend?
| Tell me, do you bend?
| You just need to send a message to the past somehow.
| >>92390
Yeah dude just tell ur children that they should tell u 2 lock the door if time travel machine is gonna be invented. If not they should tell their children
PROFIT
| I need to get drunck
| >>95032 but that means, that you have already locked the door in current time line. If not, it means that time machine will never invented.
| Why do you wanna fuck up the past lol
| Time and space is related, if you can travel from one point to another in space, there is no reason why you couldn't do the same in time. That's at least the basic idea of it. Exactly how to do it and what the concequences is? Well that would get more complicated, and 500 letters wouldn't be nearly enough to start talking about that topic.
| >>96656
Because of Planck principle. The more accurate you are in determining location, the more unacurate you are in knowing time, and vice versa.
| Ah and also time is related to entropy flow and gravity. Only when we find how to reverse them we will be able to reverse time and defeat causality. Which will be a little bit difficult seeing that gravity is the only force among the fundamental forces that is with one pole only and it always attracts, depending on mass alone and nothing else.
| >>97547
Yup. The moment you probe to learn where you are the fuzziness and uncertainty will dissipate and you will find yourself in the present.
| >>97500 All right, where should I start... First of all, that is not the planck principle. What you are talking about is the Uncertainty Principle. The Planck Principle is something completely different and irrelevent to the topic. Also, it isn't as you have said that "the more accurate you meassure the location the less accurate the time will be" but rather, "The more accurate a particle's position is measured, the less precise it's momentum can be known.
| >>97608
Start anywhere you like, it will still be the same. Many things are easy and doable mathematically but have no meaning in reality. Interactions of 2D or 4D objects follow the same mathematical rules - 2x2 and 4x4 matrix operations, yet only 3D objects exist and make sense. LHC and Higgs boson discovery shattered many dreams of magic.
| When the Universe works just the same as we so far know it under the same laws, even at energetic levels similar to one octillionth of a second after the bigbang, there is little room remaining for daydreaming. Lest we find a way to resize ourselves to subatomic/quark levels. But to check this theory we'll need an aceelerator with the ring as wide as half the solar sysytem and a power source able to deliver the entire radiated energy of the sun every half hour. Not very promising.
| With the Einstein special relavity theory, time is illusion right? No past, no future, just present. But, if that so, there must be a way to alter it, so we can actually re experience the whole thing again
| And by the way, anyone notice the pun in the title?
| Choices:
We need to go past.
We need to go fast.
We need to go fap.
Did I miss any? Or should we combine these to a sensible construct?
| It's actually 'me'
This thread is permanently archived
| You know, the topic is as old as the internet. But will time travel be possible? I forget to lock the door yesterday, and i need to go back to lock it.