Post number #52566, ID: 164828
|
Anyone heard of it?
Post number #52570, ID: 3a4174
|
Yes, alot of the votes against Net Neutrality were said to be fake and it's said the attorney's office is looking into it. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-internet-probe/new-york-attorney-general-investigating-false-net-neutrality-comments-to-fcc-idUSKBN1DL2EW
Post number #52599, ID: 47751d
|
Really hope this doesn't help them pass any anti-neutral legislation
Post number #52748, ID: bb1fc6
|
>>52599 Me neither. Thankfully though, the reason he's even looking into it to begin with is because of a lawsuit filed in response to the FCC ignoring a FOIC (Freedom of Information) request.
Post number #52749, ID: bb1fc6
|
So if it turns out that the FCC tried to ignore it because they knowingly used bots to create fake comments in support of Net Neutrality, some heads are gonna roll.
Post number #52750, ID: bb1fc6
|
Fuck, meant, create fake comments against Net Neutrality.
Post number #52988, ID: c3e6dd
|
so, americans soon will have to pay extra to watch porns? lmao
Post number #52990, ID: f27b29
|
>>52988 Not only americans, but maybe the rest of the world, too, since a lot of traffic (including porns) goes through american servers.
Post number #53315, ID: 79ff97
|
Is it a good idea to make a call from not USA?
Post number #53318, ID: 207e5e
|
Having Google probing up all our asses is one thing. Regulating what I want to browse is going a tad too far, although I doubt they'd do much besides get into contracts with major corps like FB to lower the price for their site specifically, which is still kinda bad.
Total number of posts: 10,
last modified on:
Fri Jan 1 00:00:00 1511512371
| Anyone heard of it?