This thread is permanently archived
Opinions on Ben Sharpio?
| Think I saw a clip of him on the JRE. Seemed like just one of those boring uninspired conservative edgelords profiting off of the surge in r-w populism.
Some people like him. I just don't get it.
| Got bored so I found some polarizing quotes from him:
>"The argument that gay marriage doesn't affect straight marriages is a ridiculous red herring: Gay marriage affects society and law in dramatic ways. Religious groups will come under direct assault as federal and state governments move to strip them of their non-profit statuses if they refuse to perform gay marriages."
Wow, he thinks thats a bad thing.
| another:
>"Socialism has no moral justification whatsoever; poor people are not morally superior to rich people, nor are they owed anything by rich people simply because of their lack of success. Charity is not a socialist concept - it is a religious one, an acknowledgment of God's sovereignty over property, a sovereignty the Left utterly rejects."
Helping poor bad, charity through christianity...good?
| and another:
>"The Left masks its distaste for the Bible's condemnation of homosexuality in a straw man argument that Bible believers are violent bigots. They are not. Citing the Bible doesn't make you a bigot against human beings - it makes you a bigot against sin, which is a good thing."
This guy's pretty full of it.
| Here's some more of his out-of-touch statements:
https://www.brainyquote.com/authors/ben_shapiro
| When i saw some video's from him a few years back i knew right away. This guy might become president one day,even though he claims to have no interest in that.
| Politics and religions don't mix well ...
| Zionist, so he's pro-apartheid and giving billions of money every year to a failing state instead of the American people. His sister is hot.
| >>398325
So do most serious conservatives. That's why he says it.
>>398345
Socialism often comes across, at least to its skeptics, as taking from the rich to give to the poor. There's something to be said that giving compulsorily is considerably less virtuous than giving voluntarily. You interpret it as flagrant hypocrisy, but it's a moral argument about perceived government overreach, with a special mention for property rights.
| He's a fantastic demogogue, might be the best we have in US politics today.
| he's a dumb Jew trying to make a profit off of the increase in right wing thought. He's controlled opposition
| I only remember when he DESTROYED all monsters on the field by activating a RAIGEKI.
| Bern Sharpio? Just a religious extremist, like islamists, evangelicals and all the other conservative douchebags. The only difference is that it's more problematic to oppose (orthodox) judaism, because you're accused for antisemitism.
This thread is permanently archived
| If you do or don't like him some examples why are appreciated.