This thread is permanently archived
Ｗｈｙ ｄｏ ｓｏ ｍａｎｙ ｐｅｏｐｌｅ ｈａｔｅｓ Ｔｒｕｍｐ？
| He has a worse fanbase than furries. Louder and more annoying and so much more fake persecution and other internet drama. That's why.
| I think that can apply to nearly any major political figure though.
| Because he's a big fat senile neo-reactionary, that managed to get into office because chuds are fucking morons and should be guillotined.
| >>1d385f — Yes, but here is very intense. Just look at the policy statements here. They are "the rebels against the system." LoL
| Trump is a globalist just like hilary
| >>322649
If they cared about facts they'd care more about fact-checking than the motives of a source. If they cared about professionalism they wouldn't go off about how stupid they think experts are.
| look at my ID, if you like this color you should know Trump does not!!!!
| Purple??
| Bourgeois social norms and the uncertainty that comes with the massive paradigm shift that came with Trump's unexpected win as well as his unprofitability as an elected candidate to most major news organizations causing them to continuously look for anything they can to make him look like a big, mean bad man (ironically bolstering his public image and giving him an air of credibility among those who don't trust the msm, which make a majority of Americans according to Pew).
| He literally created concentration camps for children. How can you remotely support this person?
| >>322618 Low taxes more jobs? Are you an idiot or a troll? Seriously. Even the babylonians 6000 years ago would laugh first and then spit at this mockery of a plan to run a nation. Of those sizes and economies and rudimental dynamic as back then, leave alone what we have now in 21st century.
| >>322618
More jobs alone have no value. They also must be sustainable and well paid. You can also generate more jobs with a destructive policy, like militarization, lowering environment and labour standards, trade war...
Low taxes is something 90% of population does not benefit from, since they rely on public infrastructure social programmes. Low taxes are usually only good for rich people.
| Because they were told to hate him.
| he is just stupid and incoherent, that's why
| >>322743
That was a policy before Trump. And good job being tricked into equating "concentration camp" with "extermination camp" by the msm, bravo.
| Low taxes for the rich.
Ours go up
More jobs
With low pay and no benefits. Slavery can make everyone have a job. Doesn't make it good.
He supported NN repeal which if you're pro that you are a cuck for isps
He's a saudi harem boy.
More military spending for an over inflated military
NK is good lets see where that goes
Fin.
| >>322901
Low taxes are good for everyone except the parasites that consume more than they produce. Working class all the way up, government has shown time and again they cannot beat the free market on cost or quality of services provided.
| >>323262
Yeah, we talk about it again when your "free" market goes in crisis mode again, big banks and companys crying for public money and protection and misled workers cry for leader, nation, god and race to kill their class-brothers all over the world. Not to forget about destruction of environment.
It's a scientific fact, that low taxes only feed the rich and drain the poor.
But your kind believes that everyone gets what he deserves, earth is flat and Santa-Claus is commin.
| >>323128
They're both morally reprehensible. We don't look fondly of the internment of Japanese citizens during WW2 or the concentration camps that British set up for the Boers, you fucking CHUD.
| >>323272
Communist child with boring rhetoric. Disregarded.
>>323291
No, what is morally reprehensible is taking someone else's child with you on a dangerous journey only to use them as a sympathy tool to fool people into feeling sorry for you.
| >>323333
There is a reasonable argument about going with your child on such a journey. What normal person would do that, especially in the climate conditions in that part of North America, and also knowing perfectly well that security measures are heightened?
| >>323360
One that doesn't give a shit about the child (the child has been found to sometimes not belong to the "parent") and who just wants to prey on liberal heartstrings to get into a country they otherwise would not? Mexico is not sending their best people.
| I don't like him because he's incompetent at what he claims to want to do, and I hate that he's president because I disagree with what he actually does and says.
I have yet to meet a supporter of his who has articulated an intellectually honest reason for doing so, and I also think he rapes children.
None of this is hyperbole. I am from Texas.
| >>323333 its they and their family are willing to risk their lives to flee something other than poverty, like powerful gangs that came about because we empowered a reactionary governments that employed death squads to fight communist movements.
| >>323333
"Communism"
Oh look you're a fucking retard.
Also noticed you didn't address our taxes are being raised.
Kill yourself corpcuck.
| >>323465
Funny, I have yet to meet someone who hates him that could be considered a conscious being.
| >>323517 using nerd as insult lol. many intellectuals hate Trump and his idiocy. He can't even talk like normal human being.
| >>323333
>Communist child with boring rhetoric.
Nazi child with boring, pointless and cheap rhetoric.
>No, what is morally reprehensible is taking someone else's child with you on a dangerous journey only to use them as a sympathy tool to fool people into feeling sorry for you.
You better beg never face me in real live with this attitude. I would beat the fuck out of you and no one will feel sorry for you, no matter how much you use your tears as sympathy tool. Asshole!
| >>323383
>Mexico is not sending their best people.
Mexico is sending no one. It's the "great USA" that pulls people, but basically just want cherrypicking in globalization.
And Trash like you just fear the concurence, since even the worst of the worst that come may be better than you.
| He is a criminal and his approach to issues is something along the lines of 'short term solutions that will backfire in the long term' he has extreme tunnel vision and fails to see the consequences of many of his actions
| >>323520
He talks like a simple-minded douchebag. But it would not be politically correct to call him mentally disabled, since it would insult mentally disabled people.
| >>323533 Internet tough guy acting tough on a textboard made by a Pole that hates Communism. If you're so strong why not show your macho muscles on Trump's people. You commies are starting to get amusing.
| >>323548
I'm thinking about starting a crowdfunding campaign to pay me traveling to your shithole country and kill your fucking annoying president. Wouldn't it be fun?
If it is successful, I going to expand my business on smarter tyrants. Peoples liberation Inc. Fucker!
| >>323598
>He thinks I'm from the USA
>He threatens to go to a country to kill a president
Go do it you sperg. Go shoot up a school or a mall or whatever else for your cause. Or do you dislike the fact that Prefatcher is a commie hating Pole like most normal people?
| >>323613 Go ask him if he likes Communism. I have. We've also shat on it together. Unfortunately for you, you're wrong if you think he does.
| >>323517
So that's the only rebut you can think of, huh? And that's supposed to convince me you qualify as conscious? Here spewing insults on an anonymous message board denigrating those who have opinions with which you disagree?
Like, even disregarding our philosophical differences, the man's policies aren't particularly effective, not on jobs (job growth has been steady for years and this FQ has not deviated), not on illegal immigration (it's up), not on any kind of crime
..
| >>323517
...and that's not even counting the lawsuits or the failed businesses or the outright lies or the divisive rhetoric. Like, it's truly ironic that someone so hateful as you cannot comprehend why people might hate a hateful person like him. And I didn't even say I hate him personally (because I pity him), I hate his policies because they are bad economics and they hurt the country. Have you any such articulated points to the contrary?
| >>323649
Enforcing borders is a bad policy? The commie kiddies here are all about protecting the working class except when it comes to not letting in millions of unskilled third world retards who dilute the labour pool and lessen the collective bargaining ability of said working class. Totally sad.
| He's not cute,rad,nor is he a shibe.And his worldview is somewhat paradoxical, unlike anarcho-syndicalism. Also I dislike his F A N D O M.
| >>323844
His method of enforcement is bad policy; it does not reduce illegal immigration and it overworks border security and creates a backlog of cases in the system. This on top of the fact that illegal immigrants tend to pay more in taxes than they take in services.So can you form an assertion without resorting to accusations? I'm not a commie, I'm a centrist socialist like every other American whose taxes nationalized the banks and the auto industry.
Why don't you try again?
| >>323518 You fags would allow corporations to physically rape you or tax you way more like a retard
| >>323844
I like how you just vaguely mention one of the six or so points I made and think that is a sufficient rejoinder.
Anyways, and this is further to my point, it would be one thing if he just enforced the policy, but then when it comes public he goes and says it's all the Democrats' fault, he can't even take responsibility for his policies like an adult, much less a leader, should. He has to have his cronies tout "law and order," which he implies doesn't apply to he himself..
| >>323869 It's not rape if it's consensual, and they're not saying stop, they're saying harder orange daddy ❤
| >>323875 Trump supporters are the most cringiest braindead unironic retards I have ever seen on the internet
| >>323844
It's like, you have to know that if I'm actually a commie, calling me a commie doesn't sting me like an insult is supposed to. I mean, I could call you a fascist, but I get the idea that you don't consciously identify as one, despite your evident worship for power and despotism. You know?
| >>323333 Idiots like you are yell free market and do not realise that Pfizer's Martin Shkreli, NN repeal, Iraq and Syria wars, are exactly what free market is. You shouldn't be disregarded, but taken out and shot.
| >>323604
Who gives a fuck what this pole is?
As of what you saying for supporting those who dislike Trump, dont worry, we are. We buy chineese steel and don't buy american cherries.
Now go back writing some cool stories.
| Nice shitstorm here, typical discussion about Trump.
| >>323844
I sea what you mean, but I think that "retards from third world countries" also belong to the working class, which is independent from ethnicity, nationality or religion. Capitalists are more class conscientious, that's why they'll they win.
| >>324343
It is a one-way street where only the native working class loses. Immigration (especially illegal type) is being used to attack the leverage held by the working class in their native country. Full stop.
| >>324423
The working class has no "native country". They did not own the land. It's not theirs. The land belongst to the capitalists class, and they open and close their borders just as they need it. They also start wars as they need it, making workers kill each other. As long there is not solidarity of an international working class, the capitalists win - either with open or with closed borders.
| Drumf and shillary were both globalists so in the end we'd be fucked either way even if Hilary had won. They're just figureheads
| >>324845
Skirting the point as usual. Working class in another country is not going to refuse better work conditions just because it screws over the natives.
| >>325089
There are no such things as "globalists" and "globalism". The phenomenon you refer to is called globalization. True is, that it is dominated by capitalists like trump and clinton. If common people should benefit from globalization they need internationalism.
| Agreed. Globalization is the natural result of the advancement of transportation technologies. They reduce the hazard, time, and cost of travel, lowering barriers to travel and thus increasing the propensity of people to use it for various means.
| Because he's Hiterally Litler.
| I say we nuke em all at least nukes don't discriminate
| >>325485
You explained the mechanism but that doesn't make it a good thing. Racism is an entirely natural evolutionary adaptation but that doesn't stop us from try to get rid of it.
| >>325845
I don't see how racism has a positive effect on the development of our species. While globalization has an potential if there are some minimum standards across all nations.
Also give us some examples where racism exist in nature outside of humans self-destructivity.
On the other hand recombination, symbiosis, cooperation and solidarity are very important evolutionary factors. Some of them even across different species.
| >>325972
You're asking for someone to cite a human sociological phenomenon in animals? If the symbiosis of different species is supposed to be a parallel to globalization, then I suppose an invasive species moving in & annihilating the native population might qualify. That too is a natural consequence of globalization, & perpetuates survival of the fittest.
| >>325972
Since you seem intent on usiong natural analogies, let me put it this way; as human beings have facilitated the movement of invasive species, biodiversity in most individual biomes has actually increased. However, the extinction of species which can't compete with their new neighbors is also an obvious consequence, & thus biodiversity across the globe decreases.
People oppose globalization because nobody wants to be the culture which goes extinct for diversity's sake.
| >>325972 Bees were an invasive species that killed off an insect of similar function. Or if you want examples where overpopulation in a certain biome is devastating. When there's too many predators or prey, the ecosystem where said creatures live off of can be completely destroyed. Plants are in a similar situation and also dependent on prey animals eating them off. These are separate species that simply work to survive where an ecosystem is born. No solidarity is involved.
| I just know he's a figure head of the NWO
| >>325999
>>326004
>People oppose globalization because nobody wants to be the culture which goes extinct for diversity's sake.
You know what in nature happens to homogenous, protective cultures that are not able to change, to "fit" into new circumstances?
Btw. this is where your "survival of the fittest" really comes from, not from the physical/intellectual most dominant, largest, strongest or smartest.
So called "Social Darwinists" never understood Darwin or evolution.
| >>326063
Bees (as most insects) belong to the oldest kind of species on earth. They are not "invasive". They fit perfect into many kind of eco systems that existed in earth history. It was not bees that made other species die out, it was natural catastrophes like the meteor and mostly climate changes. Actually bees are massively threatened by human industry pollution and pesticides of the agrar-industry.
Regarding "solidarity": look on mamal-behaviour and also microbiology.
| >>326004
>People oppose globalization because nobody wants to be the culture which goes extinct for diversity's sake.
And comming to the USA: cultural diversity (beside ressource-motivated warfware) is a core reason for their economical success. The flipside of the coin is just that in a capitalist system a majority (those who don't own production means) are the loosers on the long term. This was just stopped temporarily facing the competition with socialist/communist approaches.
| >>326171
With the fell of the USSR all critique on capitalism was declared as "wrong by history" so that there was no holding back anymore for the capital. The result is what we see now in the world: Unbelievable technological advance and wealth on the one side, and on the other side war and rising retarded religious, racist or nationalist assholes all over the world.
| >>326174
The capitalists even can say the truth without anyone minding it:
>There’s class warfare, all right, but it’s my class, the rich class, that’s making war, and we’re winning.
- Warren Buffet -
| >>326176
So continue hunting your ghosts of antagonizing, incompatible cultures that have to be protect themselves staying or becoming homogenous and fighting against others. Trap poor people in cages like nations and religions, while the rich continue traveling arround the world making their business.
Then for me you are equal to islamists and nazists, a class traitor, dumb tool of capitalist class and enemy, I have nothing to say anymore to.
| >>326176
>capitalists are the enemy!
>look at this BASED capitalist telling us the truth!
Make up your mind. If I were him I would also say the same thing so I can fly off to my private island while the lower classes kill all my competitors for me.
| >>326204
Don't be ridiculous. It just doesn't happen. Also, if he goes to his island, then also his private property will be turned into public.
| >>326208
When people are tearing each other apart, his last concern is his domestic real estate holdings.
If you don't think the super rich have backups plans in case things get too hot you are not paging attention.
| >>326313
Well they have one unless it's a world revolution which is move to a capitalist state with as much wealth as possible.
This thread is permanently archived
| Low taxes, more jobs? Fak no, we want “social changes”, hur dur.
Why do you think so? How stupid!