danger/u/
This thread is permanently archived
Anti-Capitalist Thread (no commies)

|


| NAZBOL GANG GANG GANG


| why so anti capitalist


| >>319290 Fuck nazbol gang, Juche gang or no gang


| >>319516 Nazbol is basically juche


| Anarchist gang anybody?


| Red Khmer anyone?


| >>319608 anarcho primitivist Pol Pot did nothing wrong


| CAPITALISM, HO!


| >>319516
>Juche
Ew pleb.
NAZTROT IS THE WAY


| >>319607
AN GANG


| Hey have you guys considered nihilism?


| Why no commies?(((


| >>319940 Because they ruin anything and I hate them


| >>319940 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-sEqzEgDZ0g Marty Robbins says it better than anyone else.


| >>319929
Have you considered Egoism?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Stirner


| >>319607
>>319907
who /anarcho-zionism/ here?


| >>320322
ANZIO GANG


| >>320374
Anzio?


| >>319994
Oh thats for sure something pretty new and innovative. I never heard about egoism as anticapitalism. Please explain it to me.
Also regarding egoism consider this:

Ruler(s): public interest/egoism
one: monarchy/tyrannis
some: aristocracy/oligarchy
all: democracy/ochlocracy

cycling:

monarchy
/ \
ochlocracy tyrannis
| |
democracy aristocracy
\ /
oligarchy

Source: Polybios, 200 v. Chr
Pls ask if you have questions.


| >>321040
ok the cycle is not show properly^^
so take this:
https://rajatghosh11.files.wordpress.com/2008/10/anacyclosis-of-polity3.gif

explanation:
polybios distiguished between three types of ruling, based on how many rulers there are: one, two or all. Any type has a positive and a degenerated form, dependend on if the rulers decide in the public interest or egoistic.
These forms are moving in a circle as shown in the graphic.


| >>321045
The universal maxim of capitalism is that everyone decides according to his ego. Now think about which impact it has on our three types of ruling. Right: Capitalism gives us the degeneration of all forms, even democracy.


| >>321040
First, Capitalism is still a hierarchy over the individual that separates them from their property which is everything that exists, and thus non Egoistic, because a only select few individuals would "own" everything, I say "own" because who actually own's a garden the landscaper maintains it or the person who pays for it to be maintained, as the landscaper has the splendor of water the plants and other activities that go into maintaining the garden, while the person who...


| >>321117
Pays for it's upkeep only looks at as if it were a painting that they didn't create, in short they surrendered the garden to landscaper, sure all property is their's (same with landscaper) but they are letting others to live for them instead living for themself.


| >>321118
Second, rational self-interest would want me to allow others to use my property as I can't, for instance, run a nuclear power plant alone or run it at all since I don't know how to but I need the power from it to live my life.


| >>321045
I recommend read the Ego and its own (as I am bad at explaining things) or at very least this: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Union_of_egoists also the Union of Egoists section of this: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophy_of_Max_Stirner


| >>321128
reading

Total number of posts: 27, last modified on: Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1529274556

This thread is permanently archived