This thread is permanently archived
Is goverment watching us ?
| You never heared about NSA, or Camera systems of government?
| If you rephrase the question it actually could make sense:
Is the government watching us, using companies or are companies watching us using the government?
| What do you think, we have NSA watching the Loli threads everyday
| It's more like they keep records of stuff they have no right to see.
| KNOWER - The Government Knows warned us all about this.
| What if the government is just a metaphor for yourself? The NSA spying on people is just a subconscious thought lingering in the back of our heads, our desire to seek the comforts of others. And when other people find out about it, we also recoil in disgust to subconsciously censor our desire and take another more subversive approach to human contact.
I know I'm watching the government
| Danger/u/ should be safe.
| nop
| danger/u/ is dangeru
| Am i?
| They're getting the data but I think you're vastly overestimating the competence of governments.
| Probably, a better question is are you doing something that makes them care enough to do something.
| >>317208 They do get all this data on us but,the government is not necessarily going to be very efficient with it. Unless there is going to be alot of money involved...
| >>318975
When a poorly written, poorly understood big data mining algorithm falsely identifies you as a terrorist, efficiency is nowhere in the picture.
| ofc
| G/u/rls, it's not about "evil government", which still proclaims to be a parliamentary democracy and estate of law. The issue is called "deep state" by some of the governments executive institutions (secret services, police, military) but also by big, global and private corporations. So in future you may not only identified as "terrorist" by accident, but also on purpose. E.g. in GB there exist(ed?) blacklists with the name of trade unionists, to ban them from job-market and...
| ...destroy their economical existence.
| They collect the data sure but other then some automated system nobody cares you watch shemale porn
| >>320393
Don't be ridicolous. If I had access to such lists I already would have published to some newspapers (Eg guardian). Actually they became officially illegal in my country (arround ten years ago). But I think it's pretty naive to believe that they don't continue doing it, especially since the possibilities increased so much with private data collecting company's and a majority of peoples ignorance about it.
| >>320594 >>320393
Also take a look on the wikipedia article about the practice of blacklisting on the job market with some examples (especially the part about the EU/UK):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blacklist_%28employment%29?wprov=sfla1
Feel free to inspect the sources by yourself.
| >>320563
You trivialize the immense issue about mass personal data collection.
Did nobody of you heard about "cambridge analytica"?
Don't be so stupid and naive to believe the issue is gone by catching that one company doing it. It's just the tip of the iceberg.
Big data-collection company rather collaborate with autocratic regimes and the secret service/military deep state in defect democracies instead with their civil and public institutions.
| >>320594
Well don't cry deep state and then try tell me it's impossible to obtain evidence. Because if it is as hard as you say then you're not basing this on facts that you anybody else could have either. Burden of proof is on whoever makes the claim, and that's either you or the people who told you.
| >>320600
Wikipedia doesn't say which ones are part of the deep state. Neither do any of the sources. For all you know none of them are.
| >>320694
What is your point? Simple opposing what he/she wrote or are you one who curates such lists? You have already been told that in UK such thing exists, and also in other places there are people who for political reasons and for who they are have it very difficult to find a job. So tell us, are you one of the cunts who run this?
| Deep State is a stupid conspiracy. Our plain old government is transparently evil.
| >>320731
Well now you think I'm one of them just for questioning you. Enjoy your conspiracy theory. Bye.
| >>320741
Just because there are many stupid conspiracy theories it does not automatically mean there are no real conspiracies. The thing is that they are mostly based on/driven by simple materialist, economic interests and not by ideological.
Now imagine you own a company and want to hire people that work for you. Now there is another company offering peoples personal data or predictions based on it. Wouldn't you want to know more about your potential (and current) employees?
| >>320901
If you own a company you want to avoid your employees organizing themselves (except in ways you think it increases your profit).
Btw. in china, which is (was) the worlds "work-bench" it is known that the government grants much control over people who work in the production. This is one reason why it is (was) so popular to produce in china.
Currently with the rise of IT employees observation increases practically also in western countrys. Did you never read about it?
| >>320905
So yes, you are right my claim of there may be "black lists" (powered by facebook-data?) is "just" a conspiracy theory. But it has some reasonable, logical and at least historical evidence - compared to stuff like chemtrails or jewish-world domination bullshit, which for me are stupid but effective distractions from actually real conspirations.
This thread is permanently archived
| Do they ?