This thread is permanently archived
California passes pro-net neutrality bill, could be junked in court -EFF
| Well, of course it is- they all are, if the FCC waves its dick around too much.
Ajit needs to have his dick cut off in the impending lawsuits on his case, then from there, the rest of the FCC can get neutered.
| Though, for the TL;DR:
The EFF says that California should have created the bill by having the ISP's enforce net neutrality if they want to keep using California infrastructure to serve their customers, or if they want to continue receiving state subsidies.
The State of California's bill instead is trying to protect Net Neutrality under their Consumer Protection and Unfair Practices laws.
| Also, comment in the article:
>It seems that by moving to strike Net Neutrality, the FCC has just created a much worse situation for the ISP's who fear an Open Internet. Now, ISPs will have to deal with 50 different sets of laws on the topic, rather than just one set of regulations. I can't see this as helpful to the ISP's at all, and it certainly destroys any benefits they were hoping to gain in terms of exploiting new revenue streams to build out their networks.
| all of my kek
This thread is permanently archived
| https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2018/02/californias-net-neutrality-bill-is-vulnerable-to-legal-attack-eff-says/