This thread is permanently archived
ITT We make a political masterplan
| Step 1: overturn OP's anti lovebeam policy.
| I start: Globalisation is not good for the environment and is an instrument for whealthy countries to expand and exploit. For people in western countries it is a blessing, because they get cheap clothes, food and technology. Because of that we probably can't completely stop it, so we have to put up some better regulations.
| No robotism? Lame
| >>130603 yeah i want this thread to be realistic. You can argue with technology that already exists
| Realistic? Then let's form a resistance and riot against all governments get crushed fighting for something we pretend to believe in
| >>130612 thats just dumb. I believe in nothing but in the things i can see with my own eyes. And i am not amused about what i see.
| You can't just accept what they feed you. You gotta have some awareness. Some thoughts that come from your OWN mind.
| >>130591
Progressive taxing should be a no brainer. Someone earning 10 times as another, must be taxed 12 or 15 times as much. Only this way we can stop endless greed and avoid that top 1% rich class. If one can afford a private jet plane, surely paying taxes enough to renovate a city is not a problem. It is the only way how society can also gain and prosper from the success of the individual.
| More likely though, these people will put an end to their greed when they will percept the taxing for further enrichment will become unacceptable for them. And again, the market will be free for other players in the bussiness and have avoided a monopoly or a way too powerful entity.
| One free particular jet plane for each person if you crash you have to pay for a new one
| >>130591
>concepts that already exist are not allowed
This is impossible, because a concept start to exist as you start thinking about it.
What about a energy based economy, where everything is rated by the physical energy that was or is used to create and/or run stuff. The value depends on how much energy is available at the moment and on how efficient it is used. This would make more sense than the current banking system.
| EAT THE RICH
| >>130786 i dont want people in this thread saying: just do communism. That's a very interesting idea. So as far as i understood you, the value of a certain object is determined by the recources and time spend to produce it. I think marx had a similiar thought about that. I like it. It could improve working conditions. And it would also help the environment.
| ┗(｀Дﾟ┗(｀ﾟДﾟ´)┛ﾟД´)┛
Let the Japanese emotions become the official language of the world
(=①౪①=)(^///^)(๑• ω•)
| >>130878
The thing is that, no matter what you change and reform, there is the unsolved conflict between the ones with private industrial, financial or intellectual property and the ones who have almost nothing but their workforce. Plus there is the problem of always returning crisis due to oversaturated markets and „to big to fail“ companys and banks. So there are two solutions:
Reset markets by war and destruction or turning the mentioned kind of property into public (=communism)
| >>132358
The bourgeois democracy has proven several times not beeing able to solve this problems without turning into a dictaturship or participating in a big war. Bourgeois politicians are only servants to capitalists. They rather let observe, supress and shoot their own people before they change something. Also practiced is proclaiming a self constructed threat of „external enemys“. Bourgeois estates purpose is to def. capitalism at all costs, not humanism, liberty or democracy.
This thread is permanently archived
| Start with some basic changes, other g/u/rls can improve or critizise them. We have to work together in this thread.
Important Rules:
>no robotism
>concepts that already exist are not allowed (communism, capitalism, ...)
>NO LOVEBEAMS