danger/u/
The true enemy

| is not having regulation for wealth & power. The accumulation of it in the wrong hands is what has led us to our modern society. Any system would become corrupted so long as there are people that are bad actors that greedily strive for more with callous disregard of peoples wellbeing & are left unchecked. It's our own complacency & ignorance that has allowed our systems to fall into the hands of evil men that have run amok of our world so they can pretend they are royalty.


| ok boomer. move to benezuela if you like regulations so much.


| I totally agree. I just want like 2 regulations- no one company/person can have too much of the economy, and no one person can control too much of the government. That would solve so much. But it seems like most people wouldn’t support a constitutional ammendment to do that???


| Who regulates the regulators?


| >who regulates ...?
know about trias politica?


| One day, direct digital democracy will become a real thing, and the world... Maybe the around the same. Maybe slightly better. Perhaps.


| >government
>digital
pick one


| Imagine simping for the corrupt and greedy while they rob you blind...


| >imagine
no need, just observe


| >>1069750
Heh


| >>1069675
So after pointlessly butchering million of people who supposedly were the wrong hands (or wrong nose) supposedly holding power you now come again up with a generic form of this idiocy?
What has to happen, that makes you understand it's not about corruption or good or evil people but about political-economical system with deeply inherent and unresolved contradictions?


| >>1069728
Digital democracy will never be a thing in a increasingly monopolized digital market where the only threat to a monopoly is an even bigger one and/or a mad fascist dictator.


| >>1069840
leg me guess, you failed to get a passing grade in debate class.


| >generic form of idiocy
what form?

>it's not about corruption
>what will make people understand?
what might help is if you state an actual argument for your case


| >generic idiocy
why is it idiotic?

you're just insulting without reasoning


| >generic form
assuming, for the sake of argument, it is generic, why would that be a bad thing (in this case)?

Total number of posts: 16, last modified on: Sat Jan 1 00:00:00 1756753363

This thread is closed.