Post number #1060734, ID: 5a8657
|
never going back to mp3 now
Post number #1060735, ID: 3ebb59
|
your cock's as flaccid and impotent as your music taste
Post number #1060740, ID: 2691e1
|
I can’t tell the difference
Post number #1060854, ID: f512ac
|
I remember this one time when some clueless audiophile who couldn't read the room(you know the type) was droning on about the superiority of analog vs digital and to prove his point he... played an mp3-rip he made from his vinyl... What an idiot.
Post number #1060858, ID: 5738f3
|
Based audiophile I would have read his ‘room’
Post number #1060992, ID: 482342
|
who is flac
Post number #1061120, ID: 3acd7e
|
I-I listen to alac... Can I join your club?
Post number #1061121, ID: c5c34c
|
I don't hear difference tbh
Post number #1061134, ID: 62ae62
|
>>1060858 >being ignorant is based Tell me you're a right winger without telling me you're a right winger.
Post number #1061151, ID: 3ebb59
|
>>1061134 didn't read lol >>1060854 you sure owned that strawman sis, feel superior yet?
Post number #1061159, ID: cee1d2
|
I download FLAC and then compress it to OPUS
Post number #1061183, ID: 297915
|
>>1060992 Not who, is what. Audio file format FLAC, with Lossless compression. As I remember it is twice less sized than pure WAV format.
Post number #1061200, ID: c833a9
|
>>1061183 Half as much is twice as half of twice less sized.
Post number #1061222, ID: 5738f3
|
That’s true…
Total number of posts: 15,
last modified on:
Tue Jan 1 00:00:00 1750774847
| never going back to mp3 now