This thread is permanently archived
An idea.
| i'd choose B, i wouldn't be able to live with myself if i chose to enslave most of the human race just so that society won't collapse
| Course B is the natural order of things. If people don't survive and rebuild, then maybe it's time to let them go.
| RUSH B!
| B. It will eventually work itself out and if not at least Earth will go back to thriving again just like before us humans existed.
| A doesn't mean we're stuck like that forever. Pick A, then lead the revolution in a decade. Gotta use the guillotine again anyways.
| >>445793 While we're stuck using guillotines and pitchforks the rich uses killer drones and chemical warfare coupled with total surveilence.
| I'd pick A but work on B behind the 1%'s backs.
This thread is permanently archived
| Imagine you're in power over your country, and you realize that, a catastophy will erradicate modern civilization.
A group of people offers you a solution to stop this, but it would lead to humans losing human rights, with only the rich being 'worth'.
Otherwise, you can decide to let civilization collapse, and rather have it develop into splinter groups.
TL;DR
A: Let the rich 1% keep others as 'livestock'
B: Let society collapse and maybe rise again with splinter communitys.