danger/u/
This thread is permanently archived
Why don't we build hybrid zeppelins to fly cheap?

| Half zeppelin (some hydrogen or helium for lift power) and half airplane (some wings and engines)

Zeppelin part can provide a safe and free lift power, so we can fly cheap af.


| Probably not useful enough. It would also be a lot less safe than a plane, and why not just take a bus or train?


| >>290653
Because flying is fun.
Also i'm not talking about a mass transport, what i'm saying is for carrying one person or two. So it's like a flying bicycle.


| >>290656
That wouldn't be profitable.


| I want one


| >>290689
Would be fun anyways


| >>290717
Yeah. Probably would.


| I guess that's more difficult for that thing to mantain high speed and stability during flight compared to an airplane.


| Still, DIY helicopter thing sounds fun


| something something autogyros


| I vote we make it.


| Rather than thinking about it being affordable, it sounds something made more to be enjoyable. I'd love to go on a sky cruise on a Zeppelin.

It might be useful on Mars though, since it has barely any atmosphere.


| Because Zepelllin make boom easier than newest samsung.


| >>291530 Only if they used hydrogen. Helium is non-reactive.


| >>291455
Since it doesn't have an atmosphere, the helium doesn't provide a lifting force there. It would even weigh on mars.


| >>291756 It does have an atmosphere, even if just barely. The Zeppelin has to be really light though, and would need rotors or light propellors of sorts, but I do believe a sort of air cruiser is possible if research is spent on it.


| >>291947
Makes sense. Maybe we should apply NASA for it. Even tho i think they are some sort of evil, maybe they give us money and reputation lul.


| I would fund a sky killdozer, ngl.
If I actually had funds.


| Why do you need engines and wings when you have a zeppelin already?


| >>292559
To fly faster, more stable and be able to land.


| >>292575 Wings sound redundant tbh with the speed a Zeppelin goes. Engines could work though, like with Kirov airships. And or stability, rudders and flaps are sufficient enough.


| >>290656 So basically an ornithopter with a balloon?


| OP, please do the following:
1. Learn physics, starting with dynamics, aerodynamics and thermodynamics. This should let you know what are the limitations to each aviation method developed last 200 years.
2. At least watch a documentary about early flight history. People had ideas like yours and failed miserably.
3. Post this in /tech/ once you're done.


| Imagine how my high idiots (such as me) would hurt or kill themselves


| *many


| >>294466
This project is already built and works like charm. Earlier exploded zeppelin projects you mention, have used hydrogen as lifter. Hydrogen is reactive and shouldn't be used in a sensitive thing like this. Helium should be used instead. So this thing is possible and safe and fun.

Total number of posts: 26, last modified on: Fri Jan 1 00:00:00 1527170190

This thread is permanently archived