Post number #290624, ID: 97ce8f
|
Half zeppelin (some hydrogen or helium for lift power) and half airplane (some wings and engines)
Zeppelin part can provide a safe and free lift power, so we can fly cheap af.
Post number #290653, ID: 31726d
|
Probably not useful enough. It would also be a lot less safe than a plane, and why not just take a bus or train?
Post number #290656, ID: 97ce8f
|
>>290653 Because flying is fun. Also i'm not talking about a mass transport, what i'm saying is for carrying one person or two. So it's like a flying bicycle.
Post number #290689, ID: 31726d
|
>>290656 That wouldn't be profitable.
Post number #290692, ID: e4a6f3
|
I want one
Post number #290717, ID: 97ce8f
|
>>290689 Would be fun anyways
Post number #290737, ID: 31726d
|
>>290717 Yeah. Probably would.
Post number #290780, ID: 56c633
|
I guess that's more difficult for that thing to mantain high speed and stability during flight compared to an airplane.
Post number #290782, ID: 0a6229
|
Still, DIY helicopter thing sounds fun
Post number #291150, ID: 5b71d2
|
something something autogyros
Post number #291317, ID: 2a719e
|
I vote we make it.
Post number #291455, ID: 58167a
|
Rather than thinking about it being affordable, it sounds something made more to be enjoyable. I'd love to go on a sky cruise on a Zeppelin.
It might be useful on Mars though, since it has barely any atmosphere.
Post number #291530, ID: 2a5b01
|
Because Zepelllin make boom easier than newest samsung.
Post number #291595, ID: e67efa
|
>>291530 Only if they used hydrogen. Helium is non-reactive.
Post number #291756, ID: 406eac
|
>>291455 Since it doesn't have an atmosphere, the helium doesn't provide a lifting force there. It would even weigh on mars.
Post number #291947, ID: de652e
|
>>291756 It does have an atmosphere, even if just barely. The Zeppelin has to be really light though, and would need rotors or light propellors of sorts, but I do believe a sort of air cruiser is possible if research is spent on it.
Post number #292089, ID: 315068
|
>>291947 Makes sense. Maybe we should apply NASA for it. Even tho i think they are some sort of evil, maybe they give us money and reputation lul.
Post number #292493, ID: 68f375
|
I would fund a sky killdozer, ngl. If I actually had funds.
Post number #292559, ID: 488ac7
|
Why do you need engines and wings when you have a zeppelin already?
Post number #292575, ID: f58707
|
>>292559 To fly faster, more stable and be able to land.
Post number #292701, ID: de652e
|
>>292575 Wings sound redundant tbh with the speed a Zeppelin goes. Engines could work though, like with Kirov airships. And or stability, rudders and flaps are sufficient enough.
Post number #292711, ID: de652e
|
>>290656 So basically an ornithopter with a balloon?
Post number #294466, ID: b9379d
|
OP, please do the following: 1. Learn physics, starting with dynamics, aerodynamics and thermodynamics. This should let you know what are the limitations to each aviation method developed last 200 years. 2. At least watch a documentary about early flight history. People had ideas like yours and failed miserably. 3. Post this in /tech/ once you're done.
Post number #294480, ID: 852663
|
Imagine how my high idiots (such as me) would hurt or kill themselves
Post number #294481, ID: 852663
|
*many
Post number #294810, ID: f58707
|
>>294466 This project is already built and works like charm. Earlier exploded zeppelin projects you mention, have used hydrogen as lifter. Hydrogen is reactive and shouldn't be used in a sensitive thing like this. Helium should be used instead. So this thing is possible and safe and fun.
Total number of posts: 26,
last modified on:
Fri Jan 1 00:00:00 1527170190
| Half zeppelin (some hydrogen or helium for lift power) and half airplane (some wings and engines)
Zeppelin part can provide a safe and free lift power, so we can fly cheap af.