This thread is permanently archived
Nano-tec or Cyb-implants?
| why not both.
Cyb implants will come first as nano is usually harder to develop, when nano comes, cyb implants will become just an old cheaper alternative.
| That's true. Though i think that for arms and legs or that kind of stuff, there will be people who likes it better than nano-tec. Like for esthetic and such. I, personally, would like altering my body using only nano.
Like, being able to change my pigments with it for example.
| Cyb implants is for those who lack creativity and define aesthetics by things that shine and glitter only.
| Cyb implants
| The biggest problem with nano tech in the future is going to be the grey goo senario.
| Just searched about grey goo scenario. I mean, as long as the nano-machines have some kind of restriction about making more of them, i don't think that's gonna happen. But yeah, could be a new threat.
| The grey goo danger isn't going to happen.
If even basic useless self replication doesn't exist, that ANY kind of machine of any size is able to replicate itself, then there is no reason for it to exist in smaller scales, yet. Everything goes through stages: "Be able to *do* something first, optimise for size/speed/energy/whatever later."
When a car will construct another car, or a factory construct another factory, only then is time to worry. But that time is still *really* far.
This thread is permanently archived
| I think Nano is better. More medical uses and reusable meaning less money.
What do you think?