This thread is permanently archived
Would you actually like to live in a cyberpunk future?
| It couldn't be that bad...if corporations "taking care of things" would anesthethize you enough.
| Well it would basically be hell but yes. I'd like that.
| I'd like it if I could be a robot g/u/rl
| God, no. I like my sky blue
| You're already living in one. This is all just a simulation. You're actually plugged in at a cyber cafe in the year 2089. You're poor as dirt and the only way you can escape is by blowing the owner of the cafe and jacking in to run away from the Hell you call life.
| Basically I don't care about freedom. I just want to live a quite comfortable life. And if I would be able to achieve that in a cyberpunk future. Then I would greet it with open arms. I'm not even LARPing right now.
| Already am, buddy.
| My life is cyberpunk.
| No, I wouldn't. Not anymore.
But I have no choice, here we are, in the present day
| If it means i can order my perfect robot waifu and fuck anime cha in VR.
| I’m all for a psycho pass style society. Idc about all its downsides.
| Honestly, I'd love that. I'm living in a shitty enough situation (not really but kinda), and I've got no future ahead of me. Getting out of this low tech low life would be a blessing.
| Sure...if I was rich. I would rather live the middle class life I live right now than a poor person in a super hi-tech dystopia.
| Better than the present
| I would not like to live in any future that contains the low life element, whatever the tech.
| >>142267
That would mean to dislike the present too, not to like the cyberpunk future. Increasing amounts of low life people is what brought to the french revolution. It never is a good thing, whatever its name.
| Yes, but being a CEO of an important corporation or someone very powerful, imagine being in a PentHouse and from over the window seeing all the poor people and laughing for that.
| >>142359
Coming back to reality, how many people (n) would someone in that penthouse look at from the window? Now 1/n is the probability of anyone in that population to like the outcome, and (n-1)/n is to not like the outcome. Combining those we rich the expected result: one person likes the outcome, and n-1 do not. The more n grows, the more the significance of '1' drops and we the more we can safely round it up that the population does not like the outcome.
| Absolutely.
| sexy robot(〃∀〃)
| >>141901
Eh. Blue sky half the time is better than the color of televisiom turned to a dead channel all the time.
This thread is permanently archived
| Would you? I like the asthetic but I don’t think I would be able enjoy living in one