This thread is permanently archived
Sterilization?
| Honestly, I'm not opposed to the idea, since some people have to go through the process to basically survive (medical or social reasons)
I had to, some people I know can't even have kids anyways, so it's useless for them
It boils down to:
1. the reason you would want to do it;
2. do you want some people to know that info about you, and if yes, are you prepared for potential discrimination?
3. if 1 outweighs 2, research more and make a choice.
Remember, vasectomy is reversable
| Totally worth it.its cheap and you can leave the hospital in a couple of hours.it will feel really bad for 1/2 weeks and your balls will look like something out of a horror movie.i had it done and i have no regrets
| Other than that, it's quite complicated to do if you don't have medical reasons because doctors will refuse to do it because it's "wrong" or "a mistake".
Being a doctor doesn't prevent from being stupid.
| >>721387 lmao!!!
>>721346 wanting to not have kids doesnt make you smarter, I best you dont want to use condoms and also forgets the existence of stds.
| >>721387 >>721404 I never said I was talking about my situation. If all you can do when you see an opinion you don't like is to attempt to attack the person, you are quite pitiful.
Moreover, it seems you can't even read what I wrote. As expected, I guess.
| I'm finding this thread honestly triggering.. it's your decision probably.. but for me is this more scary than suicide for me.. what if you decided that you want children one day?
| >>721496
you can't be triggered an be against trans rights! trannies have the right to permanently destroy their reproductive abilities!
| I have nothing about transexuality.. but i feel unsure about destroying reproduction.. it's wrong hurt anyone
| I am so fucking confused by what happened to this thread.
| >>721646 Some people started arguing, others started screeching mindlessly because they had no arguments. Your usual internet "debate"
| >>721864 but your arguement wasnt decent, just because there are children to be adopted doesnt mean people have the obligation to not have kids and adopt them
| But it does mean people who see their contribution to society as parenting (which is only one possible one) can still do it without reproducing
| >>721941 but no one was saying that they should have biological kids if they wanted to be parents, the closest thing to it were some people who said that they wouldnt want to be steril cuz they could regret if they ever felt like having kids and while yes, they could adopt, its not wrong to want a kid who has your genes and the genes of the person you love so nothing wrong was said here
| Sure, but the argument was that it's an option, not that nobody should have kids themselves
| >>721983 >There are thousands of kids waiting for adoption. No need to create more.
They did say that nobody should have kids themselves so...
| >>721984 I said that it wasn't needed, if you want kids. If you want your own "genetic kids" that's abother debate.
| Fucking Christ. Do some research and do it if it's something you want. There's nothing wrong with sterilizing yourself bro, it's your body, so it's up to you. It's not subject to other people's opinions and beliefs on the internet.
| sterilize yourself join the antinatalist gang
This thread is permanently archived
| Yay, nay? For me it's a maybe. Doesn't sound tea bag at all! (Male)