Post number #70372, ID: 40545d
|
there is no balls to touch. and does "no homo" work?
Post number #70374, ID: 17d607
|
Uhm.. okay. Which angle am I supposed to interpret this in? I think as long as there is no balls to touch, you should be safe from being called a gay.
Post number #70473, ID: 66e383
|
Op you're looking into it to deeply, or expecting more than there really is. Like >>70374 said, there's no balls to touch, so it can't possibly be gay, and so girls who get lewd with others girls aren't gay.
Post number #70545, ID: efb192
|
I think, that "no homo" should work, as "lesbian" is a "homosexual woman/girl". You get the point, I hope.
Total number of posts: 4,
last modified on:
Wed Jan 1 00:00:00 1513546149
| there is no balls to touch. and does "no homo" work?