Post number #396971, ID: 019c8d
|
I can be turned on by - any vissible part of ones body that's attractive to me (while I like big tits as well as flat chests) - the voice (A high voice is a clear downturner to me) - any smell that seems interesting to me - an interesting character - rough/intense sex But none of them are so distinctive that I would call it a fetish. It seems all pretty "normal" to me. Would you agree, and if so would you say it's boring?
Post number #396991, ID: e62d1e
|
Sex doesn't need to be a rollercoaster of weird fetishes. As long as both are enjoying it, it should not matter if you are into handholding or people with no anuses (Townes-Brocks Syndrome).
Post number #397092, ID: aa836a
|
I'ld personally love to have a rather simple partner, than a person with one huge or multiple fetishes. How old are you though? Maybe your preferences will get distinctive further on in ur life. (Its okay if it wont, there is really nothing wrong or boring about it)
Total number of posts: 3,
last modified on:
Sat Jan 1 00:00:00 1535885870
| I can be turned on by
- any vissible part of ones body that's attractive to me (while I like big tits as well as flat chests)
- the voice (A high voice is a clear downturner to me)
- any smell that seems interesting to me
- an interesting character
- rough/intense sex
But none of them are so distinctive that I would call it a fetish. It seems all pretty "normal" to me. Would you agree, and if so would you say it's boring?