danger/u/
This thread is permanently archived
Statues of naked, perverted anime characters in an art museum

| https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/367331203734306816/461934107425898497/D4_F7500_D_B23_F_4_B2_B_9_BB4_05_FD07_EFDB6_B.jpg

What's your interpretation of this?


| positive


| Is this real?


| Fake as fuck.


| >>336915 >>336907
All art is fake. Artists are liars of reality.


| >>336950 2deep4me


| This is fake as fuck


| peak 21st century my man


| >>337977 not fake.

https://youtu.be/UWYEPbnQyXU


| I'm surprised you guys find this fake. If you don't believe me, search up My Lonesome Cowboy. It's by contemporary artist Takashi Murakami.


| this is probably a commentary on how sexualized anime has become for the sake of profit

or something


| >>338422
This is ridiculous. Anything nowadays is art, might as shit on a canvas and become an artist.


| >>338857
If it has background, meaning or purpose then why not?


| >>338933
Do you consider this art?
https://goo.gl/images/NX6Dqi
I don't.


| >>338939 someone else probably does, though. it's all subjective


| >>339144
I sure as hell wish it wasn't.


| >>338939 it's obviously art, art doesn't have to be beautiful.


| i want in my room


| >>338939 You do realize that's pretty close to a urinal signed off and placed in a museum, right?
"Fountain" by Marcel Duchamp.

http://www.tate.org.uk/art/images/work/T/T07/T07573_10.jpg


| >>338939 Sorry, I meant>>338857


| >>338422 "I wanted to express the hidden sexuality of otakus"

Honey, it's about as hidden as the new years eve parade at time square. The fucking sun is more hidden then the sexuality of otakus in this piece.


| >>339273 I want to believe that's somehow shoddy translation, an alternate context to sexuality, or if this guy really is a bit looney.


| >>339273
What a pretentious idiot.


| anime is art


| Oh. It's from that one guy. I think he's pretty famous.


| >>338939
I think it is art because the definition of art is very subjective.

That being said, I don't think it's good art.


| >>339273 We have to take in account that this was made 11 years ago


| >>338939
That's a link to an article about science though.


| Those statues are terrible


| >>342945 finally someone said it. My sexy figurine collection is probably a lot cheaper and better looking.


| >>342949 But it's big.


| That's hilarious.
Really nice.


| RIP, my two-part reply disappeared because danger/u/ was reverted to a previous DB. Damn spammers. Basically, I get annoyed when people say it's not art. You can react however you like, but it's still art.
Compared to other "modern art" pieces, this has more work put into it. The body details, set aside the monster boobs, are alright. Everything else is meh.

Total number of posts: 33, last modified on: Tue Jan 1 00:00:00 1530729980

This thread is permanently archived