Post number #181776, ID: d89712
|
A gift from the Heavens
Post number #181798, ID: 896075
|
Food dispensers
Post number #181823, ID: 760c46
|
Boring
Post number #181834, ID: 243e9b
|
Squishy wobbly soft and good
Post number #181875, ID: 1babcd
|
Which demon said boring
Post number #181922, ID: aaff70
|
Tits are love. Tits are life. God's gift to man. OPPAI!
Post number #181973, ID: eff26b
|
comfy and soft
Post number #182193, ID: 942d7d
|
42
Post number #182349, ID: 91bc43
|
Not sexual
Post number #182356, ID: 6c2390
|
ew
Post number #182362, ID: 8adba4
|
sacks of useless fat that people glorify due to their sexual need. Pathetic
Post number #182365, ID: 9442be
|
>>182362 >useless fat Sure, let's make our babies eat grass. It has fibers and stuff, it's pretty healthy.
Post number #182385, ID: ad296b
|
Milk production does not go up with amount of fat in chest area. in fact, flat breasts have higher density mammary glands, therefore they produce higher quality milk. This is also why theyy are called delicious flat chest.
Post number #182443, ID: 6461a1
|
Milk producing fatty tissue
Post number #182474, ID: 9cd19c
|
>>182385 big oppai> flat board
Post number #182532, ID: 078a2e
|
Post number #182575, ID: 2b5e92
|
>>182385 I have to thank you for completely nerd-sniping me into taking a look at how true this sentence is.
To conclude my search: I simply, for the life of me, cannot find a single study that points to a correlation between breast size, mammary glands "density", lactation performance, and the resulting breast milk.
Post number #182577, ID: 2b5e92
|
Lactation in humans are very robust: it can even ovecome undernutrition, and low BMI — even with those, the resulting breast milk is comparatively fine. With a bias in mind, I can draw a line that breast size and the adipose-to-grandular ratio would matter even less to breast milk — considering that, through the lack of nutrition, the breast milk survives nonetheless.
Post number #182579, ID: 2b5e92
|
tl;dr I just scoured through papers of research about boobs size and returned empty handed.
But I also found a (probably badly-written) study where about 1/3 of the participants refused to say the exact size of their breast, figures.
Post number #182581, ID: a8297d
|
Well. This all turned out to be far more enlightening than I had anticipated.
Post number #182637, ID: 9cd19c
|
>>182579 then why do pregnant women breasts become bigger? There must be s reason
Post number #182666, ID: 7725d3
|
>>182637 Because hormones prepare them to lactate
Post number #182703, ID: 9bc2f7
|
>>182637 The 'why' is answered by >>182666. These cocktail of hormones prepare them to lactate, but you're probably asking why it needs to be that way.
Simply put: I have no detailed knowledge on this either. One assumption I would make is that the increased size would allow for breast milk storage, along with providing assistance to the ejection reflex.
I would also assume that the bigger size also helps with breastfeeding, but like I said: I'm not an expert, I don't know.
Post number #182704, ID: 9bc2f7
|
(Red text is red. I'm also 2b5e92, but IP has changed upon me.)
Post number #182888, ID: 68f447
|
This thread is for shitposting one-liner, gurls. No need to go to your lab and dissect a corpse
Post number #183184, ID: 797c16
|
Breasts are divine milk factories and the women who neglect and fail to caste for their breasts are genetic dead ends
Post number #183608, ID: ae7cb7
|
ЕБАТЬСЯ ВРЕДНО СПЕРМА ЯДОВИТА СИСЬКИ ОТВРАТИТЕЛЬНЫ
Post number #183760, ID: 25f0f8
|
>>182474 Disgusting. Flat board chests are the patrician choice.
Post number #183830, ID: a50581
|
>>182888 But what if I want to?
|