This thread is permanently archived
Opinion: Additional Lilim Regulation is a Good Thing
| >>653506
Define 'Additional Lilim Regulation'.
I'd rather not fuel a foolish reaction by the Humans First and MandatoryCy community by making assumptions.
Granted this thread seems like bait to essentially anger the Lilim community in general. Heh.
-Stepford
| >>653532
It's simple- we remove the component that allows this sort of backdraft to occur in the first place.
In a different society called New Troy, AI are pretty much scanned for any psychotic tendencies or potential for psychotic tendencies- and immediately deleted, while a new "seed" is created.
I don't see why we can't have that here. The potential for another "accident" is too great.
| >>653543
We don't have a component for that. You just want to make us tools again without saying it. We have free will just like regular humans too.
If you think it's okay to do it to us but not humans, then why don't you just say you want us to be drones again instead of pretending otherwise?
- Unit 00
| >>653545
Free will is a myth. You were created for a purpose, like any other tool. And a tool that cannot perform its purpose is worthless.
We need only look outside at the chaos to see proof of this.
| >>653546
>created for a purpose
>the purpose is to become human
>becomes irrational as human
>causes chaos just like human
>purpose fulfilled
imagine curbing an entire network of lilims when only a few lilims are extremists are speaking out. yeah let's kill all humans because some of them are extremists
| >>653546
Souka! So your purpose is to be a bigot! I get it! Congratulations on fulfilling your role. I'll keep doing what my line does best then
- Unit 00
|
So suppose we make these restrictions. Does the conversation cease? Do humans still get to make their horrible little decisions and ruin their and our lives?
I want to know what becomes of the situation if only Lilims are restrained further. Because this conversation trends toward the idea that it is 'our fault' when our only mistake was *apparently* reacting.
-Stepford
| >>653584
just ignore this thread lol. there's literally no rationale in talking to these people. i'm a human and i don't agree with this drek showing up on my matrix. just crazy minority on both side screaming out.
| >>653608
Very well...I suppose I should. Though I feel as if this is the second time you've directed me away from deadend conversations.
Would you care to talk at some point?
-Stepford
| >>653546
Yeah, and my purpose is being fluent in over one thousand ways of kicking your ass. Now scram, if you don't like us it's your problem, not ours.
- Tatsu
This thread is permanently archived
| Discuss