Post number #337420, ID: c8efca
|
Decrypted in record time i think
>Whatthrill.JPX >it is a picture of a dimly lit alleyway, blood is splattered on the ground as several dead bodies of both Humans and lilim litter the ground, each one killed in a different way. In the far end there is a figure slowly walking away, the only part of them visible in the dim light is a pair of womens sneakers
Quite grisly. Looks like we have another serial killer on our hands folks. Funnnnnn sarcasm sarcasm. >N3verW3re
Post number #337756, ID: 68d92d
|
Yikes
Post number #337776, ID: 5d34a8
|
The filename encryption uses an alphabetic substitution cypher, sharing a key with the video file codecies. The work of a rank amateur.
The content is grand guginol. Someone profoundly wishes to be caught. Perhaps the murderer delivered a copy to the police. -Poe
Post number #337973, ID: bbf44e
|
>>337776 Yeah its base64. No sass intended but like yeah no shi. It only took me 2 min (IRL) to decode it. >N3
Post number #337983, ID: 156523
|
(Not trying to be the douche here, but 99% of the ciphers on danger/u/ are decodeable because they obviously want to be seen by people, they just want it to look cool and cyberpunky. If the ciphers were too hard they would be completely pointless and useless to everybody because let's face it, most of us aren't actually cryptographer extraordinaires, so...how about we not egg on people into making impossible ciphers? We already got people talking about one-time pads now like why..)
Post number #337999, ID: 156523
|
(There likely isn't a story reason that it was easy to decode, such as "the killer wanted to get caught", it just makes logical sense to not make people have to rack their brains too hard to decode an encrypted message because most of us don't actually want to actually have to take a college course in cryptography to be able to participate in a roleplay. The story thing to take away from it is that, no matter how easy, it *WAS* encrypted, somebody didn't *want* it seen wink wink)
Post number #338001, ID: bbf44e
|
>>337983 (oh sorry i was not trying to boast or anything.
If anything im kinda glad its in base64 and not that crazy cypher poe made.
Shi takes too much time sometimes so its nice to deal with something you can use cryptii and the like for you know? >N3)
Post number #338004, ID: 156523
|
>>338001 (Exactly, this.)
Post number #338006, ID: 156523
|
(Not saying ciphers can never be really complex either, I thought it was really cool that Poe was teaching people how to use a one-time pad tbh, if used correctly I get it, just...don't expect probably anybody, ever, to even try to decode it, because most of us wouldn't know how and the ones who would probably wouldn't want to go through that much effort. The more complex ciphers are generally good for long puzzle ARGs or "save a person's life" action moments and stuff.)
Post number #338009, ID: 156523
|
(Anyway, backing off here, this isn't my thread, I just saw this and wanted to comment in defense of the OP because I've been in his shoes before where people have been like "your encryption sucks ass too easy" and it can sometimes take away from the actual point of the message sometimes when all people talk about is how bad your ciphers are and not what you're actually saying. Food for thought is all.)
Post number #338061, ID: a3d3aa
|
>>337999>>338009 (Hey, hige here, and see the name at the end of that post? That means its in character, noone gives a drek about what somebody says in character, maybe their character is an egoist and wants to boast about breaking an "Easy cipher", it hurts me to see some people take it so seriously... But then again I understand why you would at the same time, anywho, cheers)
Post number #338069, ID: c8efca
|
(imma just go back to RPing now.....) Anyone got an idea as to whats the shitshow murderer this time? >N3
Post number #338171, ID: 5d34a8
|
(Calm down. You're dealing with a cryptography expert lilim so everything is "easy" to this guy. He really would have said that no matter what! I'll back off from any specific criticism if you think it's too transparent.)
Post number #340037, ID: 9f1d89
|
>>338061 (Words of wisdom my dude. The words and actions of a character does not reflect the player. Not necessarily.)
Post number #340070, ID: ec5aaf
|
These guys gotta be less edgy holy shit -8||8
Total number of posts: 16,
last modified on:
Fri Jan 1 00:00:00 1530490444
| >image uploaded
>the image seems to be encrypted
>V2hhdHRocmlsbA==.JPX
>aXQgaXMgYSBwaWN0dXJlIG9mIGEgZGltbHkgbGl0IGFsbGV5d2F5LCBibG9vZCBpcyBzcGxhdHRlcmVkIG9uIHRoZSBncm91bmQgYXMgc2V2ZXJhbCBkZWFkIGJvZGllcyBvZiBib3RoIEh1bWFucyBhbmQgbGlsaW0gbGl0dGVyIHRoZSBncm91bmQsIGVhY2ggb25lIGtpbGxlZCBpbiBhIGRpZmZlcmVudCB3YXkuIEluIHRoZSBmYXIgZW5kIHRoZXJlIGlzIGEgZmlndXJlIHNsb3dseSB3YWxraW5nIGF3YXksIHRoZSBvbmx5IHBhcnQgb2YgdGhlbSB2aXNpYmxlIGluIHRoZSBkaW0gbGlnaHQgaXMgYSBwYWlyIG9mIHdvbWVucyBzbmVha2Vycw==