Who's more dangerous for society: psychopathic or sociopathic?
Post number #293295, ID: ff8677
|
there are both in my social circle, but i don't know with whom to be more careful.
Post number #293300, ID: f76ab7
|
Well, seeing as both these terms mean the same thing in psychological study, I'm assuming you actually mean: One of them is mad insane and violent, and the other is the emotionless type. Truthfully, Sociopaths if we're talking about emotionless folks, aren't that dangerous, their ways of thinking are simply very foreign to normal folks. So long as they don't see the point, or subsequent advantages doing harm can do, they probably won't.
Post number #293302, ID: 9b583e
|
The single trait won't define how dangerous they can be, but on average, psychopaths are more dangerous in terms of violence, while sociopathic can destroy using emotions.
Post number #293305, ID: 9b583e
|
To be honest, you'll be fine, aslong as it's not a llama.
Post number #293349, ID: ff8677
|
>>293305 I don't think so. One of these fuckers will ever want to betray me.
Post number #293369, ID: 84be28
|
Government
Total number of posts: 6,
last modified on:
Sun Jan 1 00:00:00 1527088665
| there are both in my social circle, but i don't know with whom to be more careful.