Post number #200177, ID: d653a5
|
It's like, definitely not my fault.
Also don't worry no one has worn them yet.
-Dahk
Post number #200182, ID: d653a5
|
Also if some appear to flicker in and out of existance, There are definitely not cloaking devices in them -Dahk
Post number #200189, ID: eacfd2
|
I'm both worried and intrigued by this.
Post number #200205, ID: 669ad7
|
... On a separate note, what happens if they go invisible while being worn? -Noriko
Post number #200208, ID: d653a5
|
Depending on which set of proto types you got, you would either appear to be invisible from the waist down, or commando.
I am definitely not working on a lingerie disguisef cloaking device btw. -Dahk
Post number #200211, ID: 669ad7
|
>>200208 ...Duly noted. -Noriko
Post number #200213, ID: b5f411
|
OMG Dahk, you just literally gave me a very good idea for a WMD~ Mind if I borrow some of these panties? -r
Post number #200218, ID: d653a5
|
I suppose if the more recent prototype were to wear a pair on their head and crotch, it would be sufficient to appear completely invisible... and the material *Is* very nice and soft...
>>200213 Oh sure! I can deliver some more to you if you need more! -Dahk
Post number #200230, ID: b5f411
|
>>200218 Thanks! I don't know how you get this many panties, but I certainly do appreciate it. -r
Post number #200235, ID: d653a5
|
>>200230 I made them! hand sewn, with the cloaking elements imperceptibly integrated with the cloth! and the devices themselves are military level! such a better version then the original design which accidentally tried to forcefully assimilate itself with your flesh and consume you... -Dahk
Post number #200360, ID: d358d3
|
I've seen weirder things... How fucked up is that? -Rezno
Post number #200371, ID: bd9dc8
|
Now you just need to integrate cloacking device in such a way, that it would only cloack the panties.
Post number #200374, ID: d653a5
|
>>200371 Oh that's surprisingly easy. i've already done that but i mean... why would i need panties that can turn invisible at will?
Post number #200375, ID: d653a5
|
-dahk
Post number #200377, ID: bd9dc8
|
>>200374 So you can go no-pan at will.
Post number #200378, ID: d653a5
|
>>200377 but... Why? -Dahk
Post number #200379, ID: bd9dc8
|
>>200378 Why go no-pan or why go no-pan at will?
Post number #200381, ID: bc22ef
|
I want a pair, for reasons -Falschen
Post number #200382, ID: f9717a
|
God damn it Dahk. You're still a free agent right? -Cain
Post number #200385, ID: d653a5
|
>>200379 ...Yeah why would i need to do that when i can just... take them off?
Though i suppose i could make a remote controller so i could do it while other people are wearing but... No. -Dahk
Post number #200387, ID: d653a5
|
>>200382 Sorry Cain! it was a secret hobby project of mine! i diddn't mean for it to get out! and of course i'm still free agent!
Post number #200389, ID: 497f9e
|
A panties that go transparent at random... It would make for a fun, exciting play!
Post number #200390, ID: bd9dc8
|
>>200385 Because if you can do it at will, you do not need to take them off... Or put them back on should the need arise. Thus, you can enjoy the thrill of no-pan being perfectly safe.
Post number #200391, ID: f9717a
|
Well, at least you ain't drinking. If you need a job, go to the tailors next to my place, they could do with someone like you. -Cain
Post number #200394, ID: d653a5
|
>>200389 Huh... i wonder if i should make a pair and try it with Angus later... hm.
>>200391 I'll check them out! I wonder if there are any cute girls there...
Post number #200396, ID: bc22ef
|
>>200390 Idiot, the thrill comes from not knowing if someone will see! -Falschen
Post number #200398, ID: bd9dc8
|
>>200396 Everyone needs to start somewhere. Consider it entry-level no-pan, so no-pan beginners can train and hone themselves.
Post number #200400, ID: bc22ef
|
>>200398 Tha-That actually makes sense I am sorry, your wisdom is blinding -Falschen
Post number #200401, ID: d653a5
|
>>200396 Yess!!! This person gets it! No such thing as safe exhibitionism! ...not that i'm into that kind of stuff... definitely. -Dahk
Post number #200402, ID: bc22ef
|
>>200401 I usually just wear nothing under my armor Its an amazing feeling -Falschen
Post number #200406, ID: 497f9e
|
>>bc22ef Exactly!
Post number #200407, ID: d653a5
|
>>200402 Huh... I wonder if i should start wearing less, your example is just so... tantalising -Dahk
Post number #200411, ID: 0ee218
|
There are so many questions..... >N3verW3re
Post number #200412, ID: 58320a
|
Post number #200421, ID: 497f9e
|
>>200407 Well... Being too risqué would pull the unsavoury type of people though... Had a run in with some of those types in the past. Best keep some protection at hand during your exciting play!
Post number #200423, ID: d653a5
|
>>200421 Hmm. Maybe i'll try and combine both prototypes, that way you can choose whether to be naked or invisble to get out of trouble!
Guns and tasers come in handy...
Post number #200427, ID: 37dcdc
|
This conversation... I have several questions. -Noriko
Post number #200448, ID: 0ee218
|
Y-you create a swarm of invisible flying panties... And what you do about it is create a thread online? >N3
Post number #200451, ID: 4a473e
|
Who's the genius who gave perverts any form of camouflage tech? That's just asking for the whole 'exhibitionist vibe' thing. -黒神
Post number #200488, ID: 497f9e
|
>>200451 Going naked while invisible outside... That... Might be amazing. What a genius.
Total number of posts: 40,
last modified on:
Sun Jan 1 00:00:00 1521959454
| It's like, definitely not my fault.
Also don't worry no one has worn them yet.
-Dahk